User talk:CarnageKeith

This is CarnageKeith's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:CarnageKeith/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:CarnageKeith/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 00:40, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CarnageKeith! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 00:40, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Radio stations

Please don't resurrect any articles especially those you have previously worked for, You want to read WP:COI, Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 22:24, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your comment but im not really sure what you've done? I have never worked for this radio station before? CarnageKeith (talk) 22:29, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have done some research in the meantime. The article is notable in my opinion, see the new sources I have added to it and improved upon following the guidelines at WP:N. Every piece of information is cited and referenced as the rules say, kcc live appears to be a small station on the face of it and we must remember that size or popularity do not fall under the notability criteria. I have also looked into your conflict of interest article, Im older and wouldn't fit in and haven't been involved with broadcasting since the 90s. You can read more about me on my profile if you wish. It seems KCC was founded early 2000's... a little after my time. I have had a peak at your profile and see you have rescued a radio station or two as well, my article seems to have a lot more content than those ones. We should discuss more before reverting my changes again if you decide to, as you can see I am new here and a longer response than a sentence would be great.CarnageKeith (talk) 17:06, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Sorry missed your messahe, In short the sources aren't reliable and indepth sources so as such the redirect should remain, The content was merged into another article so you're more than welcome to improve the merged content over on the other article, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 19:31, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]