User talk:Cascorrin

January 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Iveco Daily, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 19:05, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting tons of editors and tons of content for the sake of one image is extremely disruptive, please take your concerns to the talkpage, Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 19:06, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Iveco Daily; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –Davey2010^Talk 20:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing and edit warring while logged out. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Iveco Daily. –Davey2010^Talk 18:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We're not going to re-edit war over the image at Iveco Daily - Either you go to the talkpage or I report you to ANI, Given that you're on extremely thin ice as it is I would suggest you take the last bit of WP:ROPE you have left and go to the talkpage. –Davey2010^Talk 18:29, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Davey2010

The only vandalic wikipedia is you. You change the photos by changing them, you do not even change the caption when you change the image, you are not the owner of wikipedia. Wikipedia belongs to everyone. and you are going to be blocked, I'm going to denounce you to the community, you only edit to fuck me, Cascorrin (talk) 19:29, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Cascorrin reported by User:Davey2010 (Result: ). Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 19:30, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cascorrin, it seems you are continuing the revert war about the picture at Iveco Daily for which you were blocked in January. You're also abusing multiple accounts. Consider responding to the edit warring report and promising to stop. If not, it is likely you will be indefinitely blocked from Wikipedia. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]