User talk:Catherpillar

February 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Owen Jones have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Owen Jones was changed by Catherpillar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956175 on 2022-02-24T23:30:34+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:30, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to India Willoughby. Breaches of MOS:GENDERID may lead to loss of editing privilege. Cakelot1 (talk) 22:07, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 20:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Catherpillar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am unsure why I was blocked without notice. I don’t know who you are and believe the block is unwarranted

Decline reason:

We can clearly see you were warned right here on this talk page. We can also see the inappropriate content of your edits. No, Wikipedia isn't the place for your garbage. Yamla (talk) 22:27, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Catherpillar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have only just found this talk page when I googled how to appeal. Nothing on here was read prior to the block so it seems very authoritarian Catherpillar (talk) 08:22, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for the block. Just as you can determine what it said and done within the four walls of your residence, Wikipedia can determine what is done on its computers. If you don't wish to respect who other human beings are, that is your business, but you are not entitled to violate Wikipedia policies(MOS:GENDERID) nor may you detract from the collaborative environment we have here. I concur with Yamla above. 331dot (talk) 09:15, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.