User talk:Cb43569
Questions
[edit]Hi, I see from your edit history that you are familiar with Balmerino, Fife. I wondered if you could send me a picture of the river from the top of Brownie's Brae? Die4Dixie 03:15, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Connor, if you go past the Abbey and then the Earl of Dundee's housing on the left you will come to the cross roads. Left will take to Botttomcraig and right will take you to Priorwell. Go left. The next road to your right (extremely steep) Is Brownie's Brae. Near the top before you reach the cross road that will take to to Gauldry there is an awesome view of the Tay. A picture of The Old Inn and Tay Cottage would be awesome! Is your family from Balmerino? Was curious as to if you lived in the Kirkton of Balmerino or in Balmerino proper? Take care Die4Dixie 20:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Cool , I just checked out your userpage. I imagine you stay in the Balmerino Farm House( some call it the Dower House) from the angle of the picture. I see the Old Inn and Mrs. Loonie's old yellow house in the back ground. Thanks for sharing the pictures of Balmerino. Please Put up more if you can :)Die4Dixie 20:58, 15 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Die4Dixie (talk • contribs)
- Connor, if you go past the Abbey and then the Earl of Dundee's housing on the left you will come to the cross roads. Left will take to Botttomcraig and right will take you to Priorwell. Go left. The next road to your right (extremely steep) Is Brownie's Brae. Near the top before you reach the cross road that will take to to Gauldry there is an awesome view of the Tay. A picture of The Old Inn and Tay Cottage would be awesome! Is your family from Balmerino? Was curious as to if you lived in the Kirkton of Balmerino or in Balmerino proper? Take care Die4Dixie 20:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of The Hand of the Devil (novel)
[edit]A tag has been placed on The Hand of the Devil (novel), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Phoenix-wiki talk · contribs 15:09, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of The Four (TVB drama)
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Four (TVB drama), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? MBisanz talk 02:12, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Doodlehexcover.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Doodlehexcover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:13, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:PiratesDOTHS.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:PiratesDOTHS.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 12:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:Aimee Allen.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Aimee Allen.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 20:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Cowley
[edit]A tag has been placed on Peter Cowley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ScythreTalkContribs 14:34, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:TrackManiaDScover.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TrackManiaDScover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:11, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:VPPPbox.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:VPPPbox.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:51, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
[edit]Your upload of File:AmberSigning.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Balmerino.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC)