User talk:Ceescamel
Welcome![edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, Ceescamel! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:11, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your welcome. I only come here if I see some strange data here about popmusic.Ceescamel (talk) 11:46, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. I made the change. Pkeets (talk) 14:14, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Message added 14:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Montags On Fire[edit]
Hi Ceescamel. You wrote the following on my talk page:
I Love to Love (But My Baby Loves to Dance)
Hello, from the Dutch Wikipedia. You just added the Canadian chartpeak in I Love to Love (But My Baby Loves to Dance). However, it conflicts with the text. The text names position 17 as the peak, the frame says 14. Looking at the RPM it never reached the top 50 (no 64 I think was the highest position overthere). Will you look again and change it? Thank you,Ceescamel (talk) 13:59, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
According to the reference work I am using, Top 40 Hits: The Essential Chart Guide, 1975 to the Present by Nanda Lwin, there were two hits by Tina Charles that made the Canadian charts (when she was a solo act)-- "I Love to Love" made it to #14 and was on the chart for 18 weeks, peaking on September 11, 1976 (p. 63). The other was "Dance Little Lady Dance," peaking at #26 on February 12, 1977, after 8 weeks (p. 63).
Lwin says that he used the Steede Report for 1975-1977 to prepare part of his book. This was a radio business magazine provided airplay charts, and "the magazine's main pop singles chart configured from Contemporary Hit Radio station playlists was used in writing this book" (p. 11).
I can provide scans of the pages in question in necessary. I feel I've provided the research to make this claim in the table, but there may be other sources of information out there that I'm not aware of that may make different claims.
A case in point: It is noted in the table that "I Love to Love" made it to #2 on the Billboard U.S. Disco Singles chart. However, if you consult the book, Billboard's Hot Dance/Disco 1974-2003, the only entry for Tina Charles is "You Set My Heart on Fire," which peaked at #3 on September 27, 1975 (p. 55). According to this book, the information is gathered from the "Disco File Top 20" published between March 29, 1975, and August 21, 1976, in Record World magazine. As the author, Joel Whitburn, notes "During this time [March 29, 1975 to August 21, 1976], Billboard did not compile a national disco chart, but instead listed two to three regional charts each week compiled from varying metropolitan cities" (p. 7). The first Billboard "National Disco Action Top 30" chart was not published until August 28, 1976 (p. 7).
Sorry for the long-windedness but my point is that there may be competing sources for information for both the U.S. and Canadian charts. In the U.S. alone, the magazines Billboard, Cashbox, and Record World tracked airplay and music sales in the 1970s. Thus I am wondering if it's not the same for the Canadian charts.
It should be noted that the claim in the text about the peak position for the song and the Juno Award win does not cite any sources. I have a book that lists Juno Award winners (Music From Far and Wide: Celebrating 40 Years of the Juno Awards, published in 2010), and it does not list a win for Tina Charles in 1975, 1976, or 1977.
If you still want to remove the information in the table, that is fine, but I feel I've provided sufficient documentation to make the claim.
I hope that helps.
MontagsOnFire (talk) 02:40, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Oh, it helps. In the Nederlands we also have two charts, as in Belgium. However, in the text it is mentioned it peaked at 17, in the Chartstable it came to 14. 14 is mentioned by Lwin, but where does number 17 (National Charts) comes from? I looked at RPM (don't ask where on the internet) and found no top50-position at all. I just was curious.Ceescamel (talk) 09:29, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Let me do some more digging! I did find on the Juno Awards site that "I Love to Love" won Best Selling International Single in 1977, a fact I will cite shortly. So there must be more information out there on the record's success in Canada. Stay tuned . . . MontagsOnFire (talk) 17:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out the error on the image file - all fisxed now DISEman (talk) 01:51, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Alexandre-Joseph Artot[edit]
Hi, thanks for the notice. I did write this article but have no particular knowledge about him; it was largely copied from the 1900 Grove article. I think you're right, based on the birth certificate, so I changed the text, and explained the discrepancy with the main source in a footnote. Feel free to correct anything else directly in the article; just give your sources to justify the changes. Rigadoun (talk) 15:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)