User talk:DISEman

Van Gelder Studio

DISE you work on Van Gelder Studio looks great, but how come the artist is not listed? It makes it pretty hard to navigate. Cosprings (talk) 17:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Best Laid Plans (David Torn album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Best Laid Plans (David Torn album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Laid Plans (David Torn album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discographies Chronology

Hi. I'm triyng to improve discographies by jazz musicians, but I don't know what's the standard chronology in jazz. My first choice was order of release, but I've noticed that most of the jazz discographies used order of recording for the chronology. What do you think? Thanks.--Cayelr (talk) 08:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leahtwosaints

Leahtwosaints has been quite ill, but is able to occasionally access a computer again, and has requested that anyone interested contact her. Please see her talk page for more information, and thanks, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:25, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Soliciting comment...

Hi! Would you care to review my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 01:45, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- just a quick note to say that I changed your second level heading to just a bold heading in that review -- the FA candidates page doesn't work very well with second level headings inside the reviews, and it was causing the table of contents to get misformatted. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:21, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Art Farmer discography

Thanks for your expansion of pages for the Art Farmer discography. Your last edit there suggested that you are going to create a page for the Columbia album The Time and the Place; you also deleted the entry for the Mosaic album of the same name. My understanding is that these are separate albums – see Mosaic's account. Why they chose the same title for recordings which had been confused in the past is a mystery, but... If you agree with my interpretation, could you restore the Mosaic album/collection to the discog and maybe give your planned page a different title? EddieHugh (talk) 10:24, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September Not in the Rain

I'm still admiring your ridiculously brilliant jazz album article work :) Do let me know if you want Billboard reviews. I'm determined to add more of them to articles I created yonks ago. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 21:21, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Williams (jazz singer)

A page you previously contributed to, Joe Williams (jazz singer), had many prior revisions deleted due to copyright issues. For details please see Talk:Joe Williams (jazz singer). Your prior version may be temporarily restored upon request if you need it for reference to re-incorporate constructive edits that do not make use of the copyright infringing material. Please feel free to leave me a talk message if you need this done. Happy editing, — xaosflux ^Talk 22:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AllMusic template

Hi, good work on tireless work on adding jazz albums to the project. I would like to introduce to something that you might find helpful and easy to use. When you add references to AllMusic, there is actually nice template ({{Allmusic}}) just for that use that will perfectly format the citation in the references section. Instead of typing this, <ref name="Allmusic">Yanow, S., [http://www.allmusic.com/album/eastern-rebellion-vol-4-mw0000905794 Allmusic Review], accessed February 17, 2015</ref>, for example, try this: <ref name="Allmusic">{{Allmusic|first=Scott |last=Yanow |class=album |id=mw0000905794 |title=''Eastern Rebellion 4'' – Review |accessdate=February 17, 2015}}</ref>. It's great because it keeps things clean and consistent. Thank you and happy editing. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 06:41, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free album covers

Ho DISEman. Just thought I should let you know that the current standard size for non-free album covers is about 300x300 pixels. If you upload a larger image, please add a {{non-free reduce}} template at the time you do the upload, and a bot will come along and reduce it for you. Thanks, -- Diannaa (talk) 20:40, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Caps

Continuing thanks for your continuing work...

You created The Max Roach Trio featuring the Legendary Hasaan. My interpretation of the guidelines on capitalization of titles (WP:BANDNAME; MOS:CT) is that "featuring" should be "Featuring". What do you think? Could you change it if you agree? EddieHugh (talk) 14:20, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thanks for your contribution on my John Williams Discography article. This era is not easy to document, as several "John Williams" exists! Thanks! Bespin74 (talk) 14:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

John Williams, the composer

Hi DISEman, you recently added an entry in the [John Williams Discography] article that doesn't make a concensus among the experts I've consulted so far. Are you really sure that it's the good John Williams that you credited on the "Introducing Jimmy Cleveland and His All Stars " 1955 album? Just because of the label, EmArcy, they have big doubts that it's not the case! Thanks! --Bespin74 (talk) 16:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Brookmeyer on YouTube

Thanks for Gloomy Sunday and Other Bright Moments, a fine album. YouTube has these. In fact, it also now has a whole channel, saying "This channel was generated automatically by YouTube's video discovery system." Are autogenerated channels copyright cleared? If so, could it be linked to in his article? I see that YT very kindly links to his Wiki article. Martinevans123 (talk) 00:37, 29 November 2015 (UTC) ... meanwhile, here's a bit of Scottish DICE for you![reply]

Thanks you for trying to get the Stan Kenton albums posted! I have done several but they take me a long time.

Shelyric (talk) 13:20, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for getting the Stan Kenton album pages done! Shelyric (talk) 13:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stan Kenton Albums

Greetings,

I want to point out that the Kenton albums, "Rendezvous with Kenton" and "Back to Balboa," were recorded at the Rendezvous Ballroom because Kenton wanted to capture the wide open ambience of the room. The album liner notes clearly state that this was Kenton's intention. There was no audience present so these cannot be considered live recordings.

"The Stage Door Swings" is a studio album.

I could have made the necessary changes myself but thought that you'd like to handle the corrections yourself. JaneOlds (talk) 12:02, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stan Kenton Album Chronology

My dear DISEman,

There may be a slight discrepancy in your Kenton album chronology.

Here's what I believe to be the correct American release order based on the catalog number of the original Capitol albums.

Stan Kenton - (1) Stan Kenton Encores (H-155)

Stan Kenton - (2) Artistry In Rhythm (T-167)

Stan Kenton - (3) A Presentation of Progressive Jazz (T-172)

Stan Kenton - (5) Innovations In Modern Music Vol. 1 (P-189)

Stan Kenton - (6) Stan Kenton's Milestones (T-190)

I wanted to offer this info for your consideration. JaneOlds (talk) 05:19, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duster (album).jpg

Hello from the Dutch. I just made Duster by Gary Burton there. The link to showed that the copyright of the cover belongs to ECM. But that can't be true. This album was made by RCA, ECM started in 1969. According to Discogs Tom Zimmermann is a photographer, probably this one.Ceescamel (talk) 11:56, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sex (album).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sex (album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An award for you!

	The Jazzman's Barnstar
	For your prolific work on albums, particularly in the jazz genre. When I've needed to find albums I've noticed that they've often been created by you, for which I am very grateful! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BTW , any chance you could create the remainder of Template:Larry Carlton?♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:56, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Xaphan: Book of Angels Volume 9 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xaphan: Book of Angels Volume 9 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xaphan: Book of Angels Volume 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FamblyCat94 (talk) 07:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jungle Cowboy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jungle Cowboy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jungle Cowboy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 15:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good Vibes

In the past you initiated Good Vibes (Gary Burton album). I found out in the Billboard 22 august 1970 it was released in the summer of 1970 (New on Atlantic). Just Google, "Burton", "Good Vibes", "Billboard" and take nr 34 or Billboard if it works]. Very good album, by the way,Ceescamel (talk) 10:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Dreams So Real (album)

Hello again on Burton. In your article Dreams So Real (album) is mentioned it was noted in the Billboard Jazz Album-list. The text mentioned highest place 25, the chartblock mentions no 2.Ceescamel (talk) 09:48, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:DISEman/sandbox

Please split This page is so long that it will break a browser's ability to display it. Have you considered making multiple sandboxes? Also, please make sure you are not adding this userpage to categories for the main namespace. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:24, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

accidental move

Hi, I moved Theme to the Guardian by accident -- I thought it was a typo. Then I saw the album cover, but it's confusing since AllMusic and Amazon both say its Guardian. Do you know the story behind this and which one is correct? Please feel free to move it back to the original title, and sorry! --Jennica✿ / ^talk 14:14, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have A(nother) Barnstar

Hey, I don't really do this much, but for years now, I've been seeing your name pop up on jazz articles I wrote, and your edits are always helpful and tidy. You ought to have more of these. Chubbles (talk) 05:51, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		Many thanks for your unflagging devotion to improving Wikipedia's coverage of jazz music and musicians. Chubbles (talk) 05:51, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Italic use and 'except as indicated'

Hello DISEman. Thanks for all your additions to wiki. I just want to say I'm not sure how necessary it is for the "All compositions..." and similar sentences to be italicized. Also, on the album style guide WP:MOSALBUM, it states "except where noted" is probably the best wording versus "except as indicated". --Jennica✿ / ^talk 04:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Two Headed Freap.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Two Headed Freap.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:03, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, coincidentally I noticed the reason this image got orphaned was because of a sloppy edit of the one article in which it is used by a new editor. I reverted that editor so the image is no longer orphaned, but you might want to join the discussion at Two Headed Freap's talk page about renaming the article to solve the problem that other editor was trying to fix. Thanks. --Krelnik (talk) 19:37, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Fair Use in Australia campaign update

I'm writing you this followup message, as you took the time to vote in support of a Wikipedia banner campaign for the introduction of Fair Use in Australia.

After much planning and coordination with the WMF, Australian Digital Alliance, and Electronic Frontiers Australia, as of Monday the banner-campaign is active on English Wikipedia to a portion of logged-out readers in Australia (technical details). The banners direct people to this page on Meta: FairCopyrightOz. That page, alongside lots of information, further directs people towards the campaign website faircopyright.org.au where Australians are invited to write to their local MP to express support of Fair Use. If you are interested in supporting this campaign, please, send a letter yourself using the template letter provided at that link.

Furthermore, and with the support of the ADA & EFA, we have received fantastic media coverage - with article "Fair Use: Wikipedia targets Australians in bid to change the law" appearing on page 2 of the Sydney Morning Herald and page 10 of the Melbourne Age on Monday's edition. It was for a time the 3rd most read article the Fairfax website, and Fair Use was "trending" on Twitter in Australia. We are running the account @FairCopyrightOz on twitter, and we are tracking other press-mentions on the talkpage on Meta.

Today, day 2, we published a detailed post about the campaign on the Wikimedia Blog, ran an "Ask Me Anything" Q&A session on the Australia page in Reddit, and [by happy coincidence of timing] the article History of fair use proposals in Australia appeared on the en.wp mainpage as a Did You Know. [The creation of that "history of..." article was a specific request arising from in the community consultation in which you voted].

And, most importantly, in a little more than a day nearly 800 letters to MPs have been sent encouraging them to support the Productivity Commission's recommendation to adopt Fair Use in Australia. I urge you - please add your own message.

Sincerely, Witty lama 16:29, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jazz Nocturne.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jazz Nocturne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Venue/Studio/Dashes

Hi. I noticed you tried to combine "Studio/Venue" on Snap Your Fingers (album). It appears that they can coexist in the infobox together. Also, sometimes I notice your dashes are really inconsistent? Sometimes you'll have the short ones (-) and a combo of the longer ones (–). I fix them, but I am just letting you know. You may not realize. I suspect you probably copy and paste from somewhere as a template for articles. Also. "Except where noted", please. :) --Jennica✿ / ^talk 06:49, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable release dates and labels for albums

Do you know of a reliable source for release dates for albums and the labels that released them? Often I encounter conflicting data. I thought this kind of data would be easy to get and relatively reliable, but problems exist. I'm surprised at how much AllMusic gets wrong: dates, labels, musicians' names, songwriters. You name it and they'll get it wrong. I could use Discogs, but that information comes from everyone and is therefore not a legitimate source for Wikipedia, and in fact I've seen errors in Discogs. The musician's web site seems like an obviously reliable source, but often the site's discography is incomplete and lists albums with the labels that are currently distributing them, rather than the labels that issued them in the beginning. I know that retail sites can't be used, though I occasionally look at Amazon for verification, but Amazon, too, has incorrect data. Other problems arise: this label bought that label, or this one distributes that one, which is different for imports, and so on. What seems like simple information turns out to be more difficult to locate than it ought to be. I thought there might be some kind of business or legal source or site where this information could be found with something closer to certainty or reliability. Any ideas? Thanks for your help.
–Vmavanti (talk) 22:53, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AllMusic italicization

Hi. Just wanted to tell you that AllMusic does not get italicized. Some publications do, see: WP:ALBUM/SOURCE. Thanks. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 22:35, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The jazz articles you create

sometimes show up on the Cleanup listing for Wikiproject Jazz. I don't want to sound too critical, but I wonder why so many of the articles you create are short on references. This strikes me as odd because based on your User Page you seem to have been here a while and you know what you're doing. I don't create many pages because I know there are many other articles that need to be improved first. I try to do what's best for Wikipedia. When I create a page, I try to make sure I've laid a solid framework with enough good references. Otherwise, I feel I've dropped unfinished work into someone else's lap. Does that make sense? There are already too many inchoate articles on Wikipedia. Is there any chance of altering your methods slightly?
–Vmavanti (talk) 02:38, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No DISEman (talk) 01:16, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Impossible? You won't even consider it, though there are hundreds of jazz articles that are stubs, poorly done, or ought to be deleted. When you add other music genres, the number of crap articles is much higher. One good article is better than one hundred crappy ones. What do you think?
–Vmavanti (talk) 15:40, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No DISEman (talk) 07:26, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My love for the human race blooms once more.
–Vmavanti (talk) 02:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits from a novice!

Hey DISEman, I want to warn you about the problems that JamBopper has been creating with uninformed edits and just plain ignorance. Maybe you should check your articles for damage. JaneOlds (talk) 12:50, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Small tags

Hi, can you please remember to close your <small> tags? I'm noticing it in the infobox, specifically when you add the catalog number for the album. Thanks. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 11:55, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thanks so much for your help, I am trying to reform the Kenton page now Shelyric (talk) 17:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ampersands

Hello. Going forward, could you please only use the ampersand (&) in instances of song titles/album titles. So this: "February 7 & 8, 1957" would look like "February 7-8, 1957". This is per MOS:AMP. Thanks --Jennica✿ / ^talk 10:08, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semicolon

Why do you use a semicolon in discographies? Most people create bold type with three apostrophes. I don't know if you use syntax highlighting, but it doesn't work as well with semicolons.
–Vmavanti (talk) 15:36, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Vmavanti: thanks for enforcing this. i don't think it will stick with this editor tho. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 01:56, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, but you'll notice he ignored me again. When you use syntax highlighting, which I find a necessity, using apostrophes instead of semicolons makes a difference. The semicolon smears gray into other words. It matters.
–Vmavanti (talk) 02:18, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additions to Billy Butler

You added two albums by Johnny Hodges to the Billy Butler article. Where did that information come from?. Discographies have to be sourced, too. One result if they aren't is that all the people who make unsourced drive-by edits will continue to do so. If regular editors aren't going to document their work, then why should some guy sitting at Starbucks with his iPhone? Or with his laptop in front of the TV, tapping in a piece of information that happens to pop into his head. Those little bugs can bring a good article down, and they reflect poorly on the rest of Wikipedia. If you've been here for ten years, you should know all this, so if you do, then maybe you can share your method of operation so that I and everyone else can know what the rules of editing at Wikipedia really are. I don't like to see music articles treated as a rule-free zone where people are encouraged to kick up their feet and lay back and avoid everything that applies to more serious subjects on the rest of site. The facts in music articles are important, too, and ought to be documented. Obviously it can be pushed too far, but let's at least start down the road to documenting and improving the hundreds of existing articles that need work and get our own methods in order.
–Vmavanti (talk) 17:15, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dashes

I really don't understand how inconsistent your articles are. So many of them have short dashes and long dashes. Is there some kind of template you're using? Like a copy and paste? I'd like to look at it and possibly correct these errors. It's a little annoying --Jennica✿ / ^talk 01:55, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to SteepleChase albums

Hi, first of all, thanks so much for putting so many album entries up. I want to say that before nitpicking. OK, so I noticed that a lot of the SteepleChase album entries refer to "the Dutch label SteepleChase." SteepleChase is a Danish label, though. Do you think you could get someone to do a mass-replace on those entries? I fixed three (I think Out of Nowhere and the first couple on the alphabetical list) but there must be a better way than going through an individually editing them. Thanks. 65.183.153.174 (talk) 14:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All sorted DISEman (talk) 04:40, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Belated thanks! Great work! 65.183.153.174 (talk) 15:33, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creating categories

When creating albums by artist categories, instead of relying on other editors to always do the maintenance work, I suggest you follow this example showing what else you should be adding to them: Category:Eddie Jefferson albums. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:53, 22 November 2017 (UTC) Thanks - very helpful DISEman (talk) 03:45, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewing

Hello, DISEman.

As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors,
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 08:22, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation Reviewing

Hello, DISEman.

AfC submissions
Random submission

~6 weeks

1,058 pending submissions

Purge to update

I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged.
Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 02:35, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AllMusic reviews

Please don't attribute the ratings on AllMusic to the reviewers. The editors of AllMusic rate the albums, not the reviewers. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:29, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dialogues

You might want to clean up the dates in the Dialogues article. Some of them do not agree with the disambiguation page, and one of them is 2090!—Anita5192 (talk) 03:57, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rituals: Live in Japan

The article Rituals: Live in Japan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for years and not notable. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Prince of Thieves (talk) 21:59, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmopolite by Benny Carter and album editing

I know you've been around a while, but you can save yourself some time and trouble if you make a few changes in how you edit album pages, assuming you still edit the way you edited Cosmpolite by Benny Carter. Per MOS, don't link instruments, except in certain rare cases. If you are going to provide track by track credits, you need a source. I assume you got these from discogs.com, which cannot be used as a source because it relies on user-generated content. Save yourself the trouble, regardless, because track by track credits are messy and unnecessary. Name and instrument is enough, though if you want to go into detail you can do that in the body of the article. Per MOS, one person per line, "double bass" instead of "bass" for acoustic bass, and "bass guitar" for electric bass. You used small text to enter catalog numbers. If you want to use small text, you can use the Track-Note-Length template that I used. When you put the composer in the Note field, it appears in small text. Generally I'm against small text because computer text is small enough already. In this case, the Title-Note-Length template looks nice, and it's easier and faster to type. Don't enter catalog numbers. If you want to go into detail about releases you can do that in the body text. If every album page used catalog numbers, it would be a different story. But for the sake of consistency and simplicity, leave off the catalog numbers. WP isn't a record collector's catalog. It's unnecessary detail that most readers don't want or need. Last, I'm not a big fan of that AllMusic template that some people use, the one with the id number, because it usually lacks important information such as the access date and author. I find the easiest way to do citations is to copy and past the URL into the pop up box in the Templates drop down menu and let the fields fill in automatically. Many IP users seem unaware of this method. It's easiest, fastest, and most thorough. One other point: There are differences in the track listing in what you entered and what AllMusic has. Where did you get your track listing? Which album does it refer to? Would it better to list the tracks from an album that people are more likely to see? Thank you for reading.
Vmavanti (talk) 00:09, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Don't Know Why (album).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Don't Know Why (album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

We're well into 2018 and I don't think I've thanked you for all of your article creation work. It's always a great help on the various jazz articles that I work on, so thanks! EddieHugh (talk) 19:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting crossover jazz

What do you think about nominating Crossover Jazz for deletion? A couple brief comments are here.
Vmavanti (talk) 17:47, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Albums by artist subcategories

When creating subcategories such as Category:George Gruntz live albums be sure to complete the categorization in a similar vain as the main category. Why do it right for one but not for the other? Here is what I did to fix this one which you can use as an example for your future category creations. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:25, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget to complete the categorization of Category:Billy Bang live albums like I've reminded you before. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:24, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi, you did it again. You failed to properly categorize Category:Leon Thomas live albums. You categorize the parent (in this case, Category:Leon Thomas albums) correctly but don't do the same for the subcategory. Please explain to me why this is so hard for you. Here's a diff that shows all you need to do. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 04:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Joe Maneri

Good day! When you add albums for an artist such as Joe Maneri that has a navigation box, it is a good idea to update said navigation box. Thanks! --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:38, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages become difficult to read, strain the limits of older browsers, and load slowly over slow internet connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is 121.3 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:08, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

		100000 Edits
		Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that only 521 editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

-- Dolotta (talk) 14:45, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bobbi Humphrey Live at Montreux.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bobbi Humphrey Live at Montreux.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Articles about jazz albums

I've been passing this around. I hope it helps. Some notes on articles about albums.

Infobox:

Omit "in" before the place the album was recorded
"Recorded" is for a date (April 1, 2000)
"Studio" is for the name of studio, with a city next to it (Abbey Road Studios, London)
"Venue" is for the name of a venue, with a city next to it (O2 Arena, London)
Omit "Records" or "Music" and pipe the label. (Decca American release is preferred.
Every album has either a studio where it was recorded or a live venue. After filling in one, delete the other rather than leave it blank.
If you aren't using the Alt field, delete it
Omit catalog numbers
Omit space before and after slash mark.
You can line up the equals signs, but it's not a rule. I think infoboxes are easier to read when they are lined up.
Avoid the use of ALL CAPS in nearly all instances. On the internet ALL CAPS means SHOUTING.

Lede:

Don't count albums. Don't list the album count of the musician. Don't write "the fourth album by" even if you are certain.
Albums are released by labels, not "through" labels or "via" labels or "on" labels. For the most part, musicians don't release albums. Labels do. Musicians record albums. Labels release albums.
It's not "on the Columbia label" or "through the Columbia label". "Columbia" is sufficient.

Sources:

Don't use Discogs.com or Amazon.com as sources. Click on my name for more information about this subject or read the relevant Wikipedia documentation.

Personnel:

"Personnel" in the header, not "credits"
Any information you use has to be sourced. This goes for everything you add to Wikipedia. Everything. Don't add unsourced information.
Don't mimic the formats in the credits sections of AllMusic and Discogs.com
Don't enter track specific information for musicians, like "track 7" or "1,2,3" like Discogs.com. You can't use Discogs.com as a source.
Don't enter "photographer" "composer" "arranger" like AllMusic. The musicians are the main thing. If you want to enter production information, do it in a separate section.
All you need to enter is name first, en dash, instruments lowercased, not bracketed, commas between instruments, no periods, no parentheses with track numbers
Sort instruments by: leader first, brass, woodwind, keyboards, strings, bass, drums, percussion, vocals, backing vocals; within each (more than one trumpeter, for example) sort by last name
En dash is formed with the option key and the hyphen key (on most keyboards, option to the left of space bar, hyphen to the left of plus sign)
Em dash is formed with the option key to the right of the space bar, while holding shift (directly above it) and they hyphen key. A three-key press.
Make sure you know when to use the hyphen and when to use the en dash or em dash.
On Wikipedia, the en dash gets used a lot, so you might as well learn it.

One more thing:

Always keep the reader in mind. Always keep your audience in mind. The reader doesn't know what you know. The reader is different from you. Don't write to please yourself. Write for the common reader. Readers don't always like what you like. Readers don't always think the way you think.
Vmavanti (talk) 04:14, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pablo Today Records albums has been nominated for discussion

Category:Pablo Today Records albums, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:22, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Everybody Dance the Honky Tonk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Jennings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:55, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Flip (album).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Flip (album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Carry the Day.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Carry the Day.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Shorty Rogers live albums

A tag has been placed on Category:Shorty Rogers live albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:51, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mike Westbrook live albums

A tag has been placed on Category:Mike Westbrook live albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:22, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blues albums

Good work on a lot of older blues albums and artist discographies. One thing I noticed is that several compilation albums by artists are being added to the discographies of the sidemen. This can be misleading, since the sidemen might only play on a couple of songs; these compilations may span 10 or more years and include several different sidemen on the same instrument. Unless it is certain that one plays on all or most of the album's songs, maybe identify specific songs or add something like "Other pianists/guitarists/bassists/etc. also play on some songs". Thanks. —Ojorojo (talk) 14:55, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've made some corrections to Howlin' Wolf album articles. Template:Infobox album#Details provides guidance on the proper use of the template. Some points:

|type=compilation should be used for albums that are collections of previously released singles or songs which weren't specifically recorded to be released together on an album (usually a "studio album").
The infobox should only include info about the original album; reissue date(s), running times, labels, etc., should be added to the main article body instead. Also, catalogue numbers are unnecessary.
Abbreviations for states should not be used ("Tennessee", rather than "TN"). These are not well understood outside of the U.S. (see MOS:ABBREV).
<br> and <small> should not be used in infoboxes (causes WP:ACCESS problems).

WP:ALBUMSTYLE also gives advice on article layout, etc. Although it is optional, {{Track listing}} is a clean way to present the songs, writers, durations, etc. Live in Cook County Jail is an example of a recent good article. If an album article only consists of a track listing and one review, consider whether an article is really needed: "Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography." (see WP:NALBUMS).

—Ojorojo (talk) 16:31, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi – I've noticed many album articles you've created contain links to self-published sources. Many appear as the second or third source for a sentence – it is better to use one reliable source, rather than add problematic ones. Biographies and music encyclopedias may be used to provide more background and analyses of the albums (try Google book searches). Again, a track listing and a quote from AllMusic is not really sufficient for a WP article (a reader could simply go to AllMusic for the same info). Choose a few albums you can really write about in some detail. —Ojorojo (talk) 16:09, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Where in the World.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Where in the World.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No selected

Please avoid adding "selected" before discography in those sections. We have no criteria for choosing one album over another, it would lead to unproductive debate, and we do our best to make the discography fairly complete, at least in the practical, everyday sense most people care about. I aim for good rather than perfect. Thanks. Please click on my name for other notes regarding the jazz project.
–Vmavanti (talk) 02:20, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Love Connection for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Love Connection is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Love Connection until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vmavanti (talk) 23:20, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rootless Cosmopolitans

The article Rootless Cosmopolitans has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks SIGCOV in RS; fails NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. b uidhe 04:58, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rootless Cosmopolitans for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rootless Cosmopolitans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rootless Cosmopolitans until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. b uidhe 04:25, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notes on The Love Connection

Some requests regarding your edit of The Love Connection by Freddie Hubbard. I can go into detail or justify these further if you like.

Please consider using the pop-up template for citations. It's easiest, fastest, and provides more information. This goes for AllMusic too. I see this kind of thing all over: "Allmusic|class=album|id=mw0000819769" in brackets. Please use the pop-up menu style. If you don't know how, ask me. Usually it's merely adding the URL, clicking the button, and the fields fill in automatically.
Please use the horizontal format for citations. What we don't want is mixed styles, and most people use the horizontal. In additiona, I see the same citation from The Rolling Stone Jazz Record Guide all over the jazz articles. Some improvements you might consider (other than horizontal): add periods to "U.S." (it's U.S. or US, not USA) and delete blank fields. This too can be done with the pop up menu, using cite book; you add the ISBN and click the button.
Try to avoid using semicolons as bold type. Use the apostrophes instead. The semicolons skew the text for people who use colored syntax.
Try to avoid having two linked items next to each other, as in jazz musician Freddie Hubbard. This makes it difficult to know which word to click.
Generally citations should be the last name of the author. If someone else has used the same author in the article, you can use something like "Larkin1" or a page number or some other way of distinguishing that particular citation. In longer articles, it can be v. important to have easily recognizable, distinct citations.
You don't need to link anything in citations. Readers rarely click in footnotes. Brackets in citations are a waste of time and another excuse to fill the screen with blue links.
The infobox was right except the type was listed Studio Album, bracketed and in caps. Use small letters, no brackets: studio
Try to avoid separating song lists into Side A and Side B. I suspect there are many people today who have never owned vinyl, so the convention of Side A and Side B is probably pointless for them. There are many ways of acquiring music besides vinyl.
Avoid track information in Personnel sections. This usually comes from Discogs.com, which technically isn't a source that can be cited. To me the information is extraneous. It's enough to know who is on the album. The rest is a waste of time that could be better spent.
If there is a bassist, try to use either "double bass" or "bass guitar" rather than simply "bass", which sometimes gets tagged as too vague.

Thank you for reading and for your many contributions.-Vmavanti (talk) 23:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cadet

What that article really needs is sourced material, not more albums. We usually omit catalog numbers. The article needs content, not more data. Articles that are merely lists sometimes get deleted because they don't provide any content. Wikipedia isn't a record collector's catalog. It's written for everyone.
Vmavanti (talk) 00:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Printmakers

I saw from the edit history that you created the article for The Printmakers. There are some problems. Before you create another article, please read the Wikipedia documentation, starting with notability. Try to establish notability before creating an article. This saves everyone a lot of wasted time, effort, and aggravation. One sentence doesn't constitute an "article". That should be common sense. One or two sources usually isn't enough, something everyone should have learned in school. See the documentation for the latest version of infoboxes. There needs to be consistency from article to article. Omit catalog numbers. These are of special interest to a tiny group of collectors but mean nothing to the common reader and are not in the public interest. References and external links are not interchangeable and therefore they or the sections that contain them should not be combined or confused. Don't put entire sentences in italics simply because it looks pretty on the screen. It doesn't. Don't link instruments unless it's something out of the ordinary. Linking them assumes that every person who reads an article on an album will automatically want to read about, say, the history of the trumpet. Not true. The preferred order for personnel comes from classical music, where instruments are listed from high notes to low. In jazz, this usually means: leader first (it's their album), then brass (trumpet, trombone), woodwinds (soprano sax on down), piano, keyboards, guitar, bass guitar or double bass, drums, percussion, vocals. Feel free to make changes on any articles you have created. Click on my name for help and feel free to ask me questions.
Vmavanti (talk) 13:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Duo ((Hank Jones and Red Mitchell album)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Duo ((Hank Jones and Red Mitchell album). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 7#Duo ((Hank Jones and Red Mitchell album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:29, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Impressions! (Paul Horn album).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Impressions! (Paul Horn album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New York Jazz (album).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New York Jazz (album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Masada Live at Tonic 1999.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Masada Live at Tonic 1999.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...

I hope you are well - you've been one of the most incredible contributors to Wikipedia. I've always enjoyed reading your articles and you've helped introduce me to so many wonderful albums I hadn't heard before. Thank you. No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:40, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Checking

Are you all right? I haven't seen you around much here recently. EddieHugh (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I missed your vital work too. Hope all is well. You've done so much here, it's incredible. No Swan So Fine (talk) 12:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

50th Birthday Celebration album covers

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I will be exporting to Commons the twelve 50th Birthday Celebration album covers for John Zorn you uploaded. As their designs consist only of simple geometric shapes and text, they are not subject to copyright – see {{PD-logo}}. Volumes 5 to 12 all use file names of the form "File:50th Birthday Celebration Volume n.jpg", which matches the titles of the respective album articles. But volumes 1 to 4 use different file naming structures, and I will be renaming them to match those of volumes 5 to 12. Once the twelve images are exported to Commons, I will be uploading higher resolution images from AMG, and their corresponding fair-use files in Wikipedia will be deleted. So you may see deletion notices on your talk page. —Bruce1ee^talk 11:45, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Douglas

Dave Douglas has asked me to do some updates on his article. Would you consider adding a few sub articles to his recent albums since 2014? If not, would it be okay for me to continue the process? Mistephake (talk) 15:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC) 15:41, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tell Me Everything for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tell Me Everything is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tell Me Everything until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– DarkGlow • 08:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Zorn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Barry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Here (Cal Tjader album).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Here (Cal Tjader album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Monday Night at Birdland

The article Monday Night at Birdland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough WP:RS to pass WP:ALBUM and not sure where to redirect this article to.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sikonmina (talk) 06:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Congrats, not only for your excellent works with jazz discographies but also to be an example to follow to jazz lovers contributors Urueu (talk) 15:20, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thankyou for your hard work on adding jazz albums which might be too obscure for the average person but which us music afiicionados listen to. You have good taste, you must be a musician yourself surely. Everytime I look I see your name on the articles. Still so many articles still missing though, even early BB King albums still missing! Thanks! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:11, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Consciousness! (Eric Kloss album)

The article Consciousness! (Eric Kloss album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Joyride (Stanley Turrentine album).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Joyride (Stanley Turrentine album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jennifer Choi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jennifer Choi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Choi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 04:33, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for all of your hard work on Wikipedia. Caro7200 (talk) 21:08, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fela's London Scene.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fela's London Scene.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

Hi DISEman, Do you know if this photograph portrays Don Moye? Vysotsky (talk) 13:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I seriously doubt it DISEman (talk) 09:18, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can imagine that. At the same time, Art Ensemble of Chicago performed at this festival on Sunday 28 June 1970, and Don Moye was one of the few persons (with Dr John) to dress extravagantly. Vysotsky (talk) 20:22, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IP blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DISEman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 192.168.1.103. Thanks. DISEman (talk) 04:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That is the address of your home network and not the IP you actually use to connect to the internet. Your IP should appear in the message that you see when you attempt to make an edit, or you can use a tool like whatismyip.com to determine it.(sometimes googling "what is my IP" works, too). We need to know your actual IP in order to look into this. 331dot (talk) 08:22, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

DISEman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. Message says 49.196.0.0/16 but web tool states correct IP address is 49.196.19.165 - Hope this helps DISEman (talk) 11:59, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

That's within that range, actually. But it will be moot in a few seconds, as since you are a very experienced editor and you've been at this almost as long as I have I will be granting you IPBE. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Daniel Case (talk) 07:51, 15 November 2023 (UTC) Daniel Case (talk) 07:51, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Filmworks IX.jpg

The file File:Filmworks IX.jpg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ECM

Thank you for all the work you've done over the years! I'm trying to go through and standardize the ECM releases, and it seems you've done half of everything productive on the lot. I tried to find the neutral common ground that preserved what was there and minimized words, and I ended up with a pretty slight modification of your template—please let me know if there's anything you think I should changed! TlonicChronic (talk) 15:07, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow… that work was so long ago I'm just really glad that someone else has invested time in reviewing it.

Thanks so very much DISEman (talk) 23:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A Date with Jimmy Smith Volume Two

The article A Date with Jimmy Smith Volume Two has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Merged with Volume One A Date with Jimmy Smith, Vols. One and Two

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gut Feelings (album)

The article Gut Feelings (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 20:50, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jazz Recital for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jazz Recital is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jazz Recital until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mach61 (talk) 14:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Julius Watkins Sextet.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Julius Watkins Sextet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Graywalls (talk) 04:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Urge (album).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Urge (album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sortie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sortie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]