User talk:Chander Kapoor

January 2015

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Chander Kapoor. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 15:28, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chander Kapoor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chander Kapoor, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AllyD (talk) 15:29, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ally, I understand that you have found this page to be violating the rules of Wikipedia but I had not finished the article yet and wanted to even give links to few articles which were published by few leading media publications but had left it like this to be edited for next couple of days and soon there are few valuable books that I am writing on the pertinent topics are going to be published and would give the referral links of that literature as well in future on this page. I even understand that you had mentioned that someone else might write about me on Wiki Articles but this account has been created by one of my team member and even if he writes on this page the name of page will remain the same, right, or is there something which I am missing on? I can only make a suggestive request to kindly undelete this page so that I can further edit it and make it a useful article for the readers. It might sound an autobiographical page but the motive is to share useful and readable content, I have just started writing and a lot has yet to come. If the problem is with the external links, I can certainly remove the links, if you suggest. Eagerly Waiting for your revert. Thanks 17:59, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

You may wish to use the Articles for creation process: that allows you to prepare a draft and then have it reviewed independently. But noting your comment about a team member, please also note that an editing account should be specific to one user. AllyD (talk) 18:23, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]