User talk:Chandra4479

September 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Kalyandurg, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. unreferenced and rm as per WP:Gallery. Do not add mandal info, it is not a mandal. Can create separate page for mandal. Also, do not add galleries. Vin09 (talk) 16:43, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

My intention was not to disturb your work, but wiki needs references. Please read WP:References. Whatever you write, you should be able to provide references, so that it will be like a proof when it is read by other users they refer the content in the prescribed site or journal or book. I hope you understand.--Vin09 (talk) 04:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Kalyandurg. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 04:12, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Kalyandurg, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 12:27, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kalyandurg. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Vin09 (talk) 12:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of mandals and villages in Guntur district. Vin09 (talk) 12:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September

The way you copy pasted on my talk page as this is not correct, beacuse you have blanked the content on List of mandals and villages in Guntur district and not me.--Vin09 (talk) 13:04, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Chandra4479 reported by User:Vin09 (Result: ). Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 13:11, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014, continued

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Guntakal railway division without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Denisarona (talk) 13:15, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Understand

In March 2012 Kalyandurg became a municipality. That sentence belongs to municipality and civic administration section. You removing the referenced content and providing your research by writing imperial gazetter isn't enough for proof. You need to cite them, there are many edition of it.--Vin09 (talk) 02:12, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

What are these edits, why were you vandalising these pages page1 saying it is WP:OR, pasting the same warning to me, this edit saying the page was not a per wiki rules, quoting the summary as wrong information.--Vin09 (talk) 02:17, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Kalyandurg. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Please stop removing sourced material while adding unsourced material. Bgwhite (talk) 05:44, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kalyandurg. Vin09 (talk) 14:05, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Vin09: Chandra4479, you will be blocked the next time you remove sourced material. This is called disruptive editing. The reference being used for the demographic section clearly states Kalyandurg, not Kolakaluru. Kolakaluru is not mentioned anywhere in the reference. The other reference you are removing also mentions Kalyandurg and Kolakaluru is not mentioned anywhere. Bgwhite (talk) 20:10, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgwhite: he was stating the earlier edit here, where by mistake I have written the name as Kolakaluru instead of this page name. But the demographics are not false, only because earlier I have edit Kolakaluru page, he saw a wrong name and thinks everything is wrong and blanked the whole section. Instead of referring the reference and correcting.--Vin09 (talk) 02:42, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]