User talk:Chem2019

Hello, I'm Edgar181. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. [1] -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:36, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Chemical kinetics

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Chemical kinetics, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:43, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 18:21, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COI links and sockpuppetry

I see that you have been adding links to priyamstudycentre.com. I would suggest that you stop doing so as it is not a reliable source, and I would guess that you have a conflict of interest in linking to the site.

I also see similarities in your editing to the accounts Priyamstudycentre, Kajalpanda and Chemstudy. I suggest that you review information at sockpuppets and that you stop this disruptive editing. Alternatively we can progress down full investigative processes to review the accounts, and I will consider whether local or global blacklisting is appropriate.

OR you can edit like a good soul looking to produce quality encyclopaedia with the best information.

There will be no further warnings. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:14, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I can't do this, but I can't understand why it is not reliable source Chem2019 (talk) 08:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you will warn me to add links from priyamstudycentre.com, but can I add some valuable content links from priyamstudycentre.com which help Wikipedia reader to get better knowledge

September 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Fluorine compounds. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. DMacks (talk) 18:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo I cannot understand why you can block and make my link on the spamming list because the link which I added contains helpful topics. I earnestly requested you please consider me to unblock my account.