User talk:Chemprofmatt

Welcome!

Hello, Chemprofmatt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:51, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at USS John C. Stennis. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. - wolf 15:53, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added note

Comments such as ''We can do this all day long if you'd like" from your edit summary are not helpful, and only serve to antagonize and show your intention to prolong the dispute. Instead, you should try to engage the other editor(s) on the article talk page and discuss the matter collegially, to try to come to an agreement. If this doesn't wofk out, then your next step would be dispute resolution. But in the meantime, you should leave that content be. Further reverts and edit-warring will only lead to sanctions. - wolf 16:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Teahouse!

Hello! Chemprofmatt, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

- wolf 16:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]