User talk:Chevron justinh

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Chevron justinh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Talk:Chevron Richmond Refinery. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Dynaflow babble 01:15, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chevron Richmond Refinery

Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to).

Also since you seem to be so aware of the situation, would you be able to produce any more references for any other notable events in the refinery's history, spills, releases, flair ups, local controversies, the refinery you can't hear/see/smell pledge, community protest, awards, commendations, history, a description of the workforce, the rod and gun club, the geography, the personnel, the good the bad the ugly the interesting, community groups, the controversy with the 72M/73 AC Transit bus line, what actually goes on, on a day-to-day basis, improvements, setbacks, etc etc.Troyster87 (talk) 05:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Chevron Richmond Refinery. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sarwicked (talk) 17:48, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks everyone for your help and insight. It was not my intent to blank the page. That was a mistake. I've made edits to the "toxic spills" section according to my early note in the discussion section.

I'd be more then happy to help with additional information and content for this page and others pertaining to Chevron Corporation and our operations around the world.

Thx Chevron justinh (talk) 18:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing out that the oleum spill was resultant of a General Chemical operation not Chevron, that was my mistake, I cited an incredibly long article about Chevron that shifted onto the G.C. spill within a section covering Chevron spills and I jumbled them together, furthermore now that I know about GC being responsible for the spill and with all the sources you pointed out I will write an article on GC. Additionally I would love it if you would be able to point out any more references about Chevron as I mentioned in my earlier comment, also a good way to speed up communication is not by answering on your talk page but by clicking on (talk) after my signature (Troyster87) following the link and answering there of for continuity purposes letting me know you have replied on your talk page. Cheers. p.s. are there any other Chevron topics you think are meriting of an article, such as the corporate headquarters? or another major facility? and i have a question for you, where was chevron headquartered before San Ramon? Richmond? San Francisco? What goes on in the office buildings at the refinery in Richmond?Troyster87 (talk) 23:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009:

Hello wiki community. I've been inactive for a while but have some minor edits that I'd like to make to the Techron page. There are a few subtle issues with the language that I'll be amending. Also, with your blessing I'd like to work closely with our fuels and fuel additive teams to expand this page.

All the best, Justin with Chevron

Speedy deletion nomination of Tahiti Field

A tag has been placed on Tahiti Field requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 14:53, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]