User talk:ChickenWang24

May 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Rusk, Texas—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Rusk, Texas. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:30, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rusk, Texas, you may be blocked from editing. Jusdafax (talk) 05:34, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Rusk, Texas. Materialscientist (talk) 05:40, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is used only for disruptive editing and has a disruptive name. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:34, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]