User talk:ChiefConvict

Shared account

Hi ChiefConvict I noticed you used the term "we" in your undelete request here. Please see WP:NOSHARE. Accounts should be a single individual and not shared. Please confirm you are the only person using this account. Also, if you are affiliated with the subject, you have conflict of interest and will need to declare so. Please see Plain and simple conflict of interest guide for additional guidance. S0091 (talk) 16:08, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, It will be myself as an individual and I have declared on my account. I am new to Wikipedia, apologies for the mistakes. I will be taking press articles published to create the Wikipedia page for Convict Games, the company I have co-founded. I want to ensure Convict Games is recorded on Wikipedia for future people. Thanks. ChiefConvict (talk) 16:45, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. There is a userbox you can place on your user page, {{Template:UserboxCOI|Convict Games}} , to declare your COI. I think you should just be able to copy/paste it from this message but let me know if you run into issues. Thanks again. S0091 (talk) 16:54, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the COI template! I will leave a welcome message with additional information about editing Wikipedia. I do see above you are planning to use press releases as your sourcing. That will not be sufficient to establish notability, which requires significant coverage by independent reliable sources. Press releases come from the subject so are not independent, similar to their web or social media sites. Games need to meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. You my find this essay helpful. Actually, WP:NCORP, the guideline for organizations, has some great examples of what is considered "independent" and "significant" (starting just above WP:CORPDEPTH) that you may want to check out to get an idea of what is required. S0091 (talk) 18:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. I have already switched to using press articles. I decided to update and rewrite the Convict Games's page today. I have submitted a draft for review. Thank you for the help and assistance with this. I hope I have done this new page up to standard.ChiefConvict (talk) 18:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the Company Philosophy section to just Overview. If you disagree with the change, feel free to revert back. What I see in similar articles is a History section, then Releases. Something to think about anyway. I make no judgement as to the sourcing but wonder if they support the game(s) more so than the company. Will see how the drunk koala bear plays to the masses, lol. S0091 (talk)19:05, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Thanks for the fix and edit. Makes sense. I think they prove Convict Games well and were the first articles establishing Convict Games and STONE. I will continue to expand the page ahead, but figured it was a good start. ChiefConvict (talk) 19:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just keep in mind if the article is accepted you nor anyone affiliated with the company should edit the article directly in any significant way. You can make edit requests though. I know folks believe having a Wikipedia article about themselves/company is the jam, but after being around this place for awhile, I personally would avoid it. Once its published, you have really no control over the content. S0091 (talk) 19:44, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome ChiefConvict!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,194,627 registered editors!

Hello, ChiefConvict. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful:

The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia

A Primer for Newcomers

Introduction to Wikipedia

Wikipedia Training Modules

Simplified Manual of Style

Creating a new article via the Article Wizard

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:

1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly

2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources

3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

Brochures: Editing Wikipedia & Illustrating Wikipedia
Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia
Help

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 18:22, 2 August 2020 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Convict Games (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IVORK was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Convict Games and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Convict Games, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— IVORK _Talk 01:33, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ChiefConvict! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — IVORK _Talk 01:33, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Convict Games (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not notable per WP:NOTINHERITED, although the game developed by the studio, Stone (video game) may in fact be notable and merit an article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Convict Games and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Convict Games, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 18:09, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Convict Games

Hello, ChiefConvict. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Convict Games".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]