User talk:Chris535355

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chris535355 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AS clearly stated in the wikipedia any unblock which is not lawful (meaning not having a purpose, such as banning someone for someone elses mistakes) is not allowed. A lso reed funds are a major donator to wikipedia, which is part of my family for years. I depend greatly on wikipedia to increase my knowledgfe. By banning someone for no reason as myself hurt your chance for donations but also makes it difficult to further my education. Again i reqest you to please undo my block as i can prove trustwortthy. Ive recently became intersted in becoming an administrator and this will hurt my chances. In conclusion please review and grant an unblock under such circumstances. Thanks so very much!

Yours Truely and Sorry Christopher Barcase Reed fund Manager Ceo of venture capital Mortage represntitive at Chase inc.

Decline reason:

If you're a CEO, why do you write like a schoolkid? Anyway, since you've demonstrated that you're not going to address your block in a constructive manner, your right to file further unblock requests has been revoked. Max Semenik (talk) 15:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not really sure how any admin's going to accept your appeal when you just posted a fake "request accepted" notice. — Francophonie&Androphilie (Je vous invite à me parler) 15:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chris535355 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This was not me. It was friend that uses my computer during my trip to the bathroom. Therefore it was not and the school will punnish [name redacted] his bad behavior sorry please undo the block.

Decline reason:

We never unblock in such situations. Max Semenik (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, I'm Pmyteh. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!

November 2012

Hello, I'm James086. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to User talk:Pmyteh, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, James086 ^Talk 15:08, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Pmyteh with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 15:12, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kenneth Darling with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 15:13, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bencherlite ^Talk 15:14, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]