User talk:Cinema Clown

Not good form to reply to every single comment in your own RM

Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:18, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fine @In ictu oculi. But isn't that space meant to provide room for, umm..., discussion? Cinema Clown (talk) 14:30, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My talkpage

Hi. Please do not post on my talkpage. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 15:22, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Maybe suggest an alternative for that? @Lugnuts Cinema Clown (talk) 15:40, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Grand Illusion, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 18:46, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Betty Logan. Maybe ask your friend Lugnuts first why he has been removing my comments from his own talk page? And maybe also care to respond to my comment on your own talk page too. Cinema Clown (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnuts can remove whatever he wants from his own talk page per WP:OWNTALK. Betty Logan (talk) 19:17, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TPO makes it crstal clear you are not permitted to remove other editors' comments. This is the third time you have removed comments from this discussion. If you do it again you will leave me with no option other than to report you to administrators. Betty Logan (talk) 19:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Cinema Clown (talk) 19:37, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Betty Logan (talk) 19:43, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:45, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You do NOT remove other people's comments from a discussion on a talk page because they do not agree with your proposal. Period. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:48, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Use of multiple accounts

Could you please explain why you have created and continue to use multiple accounts? At the very least the following accounts are Confirmed to be connected to this one:

Agantuk0708 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Stolonifer (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Aaron the Auteur (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

You're using the undeclared accounts in the same topic area as you edit which runs afoul of WP:SOCK. Before I block all but the oldest account (i.e. Agantuk0708) indefinitely, I'm curious as to you whether have an explanation for the odd use of the accounts.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well I do have an explanation, which I don't feel that I'm not obliged to give. You can happily block all the accounts indefinitely. Your inefficiency shows, in that you couldn't identify the actual oldest account User:Bubaikumar. Best wishes Ponyo. Cinema Clown (talk) 03:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's not inefficiency, it's how checkuser works. But that's neither here nor there now. Ciao. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:22, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your last little temper tantrum and removed your talk page access. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:31, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]