User talk:Citizen/presidential campaign, 2008

This page was nominated for deletion on 02-Mar-08. The result of the discussion was keep.

i disagree[edit]

well i can't say i agree with all your political veiws i like the space exploration enviormental cleanliness and helping to stop poverty i also liked the making our educational system better but making drugs prostitution and gambling is a horrible idea you say it will lower the crime rate but it will just mean people won't be going to jail for there crimes your not actually fixing anything and also what is your name anyways it can't be Uga Man can it also if adults were allowed drugs it would influence more kids to do drugs and hundreds of children die each year due to overdosing and drug abuse and drug usage is not a "victimless crime" as you called it the user not only hurts himself ussually to the piont of painfull death but also loses self control and common sense and indagers anyone near him also this would cause more deaths through driving accidents because people might try to drive while high and making prostitution legal would cause a widespread outbreak of HIV/AIDS and many other sexually transmitted disieses which would also cause much death and also many children being born with theese sicknesses and dying so prostitution is hardly victimless either as it causes much death and you say you want to stop poverty but if you make gambling legal millions will go bankrupt and lose there jobs

bhuddist?[edit]

i'm really trying not to criticize you with my comment theyre actually just questions and oppinions and i would like you to reply uga man and answer me but i have another question since my last post you say your a bhuddist but you obviously have internet since you have wikipedia don't bhuddists beleive in owning as few objects as they can as they beleive detatching themselves from worldly things will decrease theyre desires and thus decrease theyre suffering i guess what i'm saying is what kind of bhuddist ha the internet? you might as well say your ammish and own a cell phone,colored clothing, a computer and, a hovvercraft machine. also i see the picture of you in a military uniform aren't bhuddists supposed to be peaceful and don't beleive in warCharlieh7337 (talk) 03:24, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry more questions please answer uga man[edit]

your page says your ineligible to be a candidate i don't think youll ever get to be a candidate if your uneligible besides even if you did become a candidate you couldn't fund your campaighn if your a trash collecter also why are you ineligible arn't you a citizen or have you been to jail recently? and also what makes you think youll get to be a candidate how are you gonna make yourself eligible? once again these are not insults theese are serios questions and i really want answersCharlieh7337 (talk) 03:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your picture???[edit]

that picture isn't of you it's of william henry harrisonCharlieh7337 (talk) 03:33, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've already failed[edit]

You appear to be a typical American presidential candidate with typical ignorant views of the world. For example your claim the basketball is the most popular sport in the world is clearly not grounded in fact... Nil Einne (talk) 16:25, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahaha. Agree. Enigma ^msg! 07:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hilarious posts I will try to incorporate in the article[edit]

- - - - It's pure nonsense. Funny nonsense. George W. Bush can't tell the Mavericks of the NBA to move to Singapore, and to sign Condi Rice, now can he? Basketball 110 _{what famous people say} ♣ 18:36, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        If all those parties were Wikipedia users and the Mavericks were a userspace page that acted like a personal website, and George W. Bush were a body of consenting users in favor of delete, then yes, that could happen. Equazcion •✗/C • 18:41, 2 Mar 2008 (UTC)
I have contacted Jimbo (Wales). I say we wait for him to say whether or not this is what he thought of Wikipedia being. Basketball110 _{what famous people say} ♣ 18:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:PERJIMBO? Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 18:39, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - You know, I'm sure there was a page somewhere about how "per Jimbo" is rarely a valid argument. I can't find it right now, however... anyone else know what I'm talking about? Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 18:42, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? His opinion is just like everyone else's in discussions like this. He often states that he will rarely invoke a "Jimbo says" rule. Metros (talk) 18:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - "Ignore the rules." And Mr. Wales is the frontrunner to be Uga Man's VP.Basketball110 _{what famous people say} ♣ 18:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - What does Wikipedia:Ignore all rules have to do with what Metros said? Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 18:43, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well don't hold your breath. I was informed of this debate via that page. Happy editing, SqueakBox 18:41, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Don't feed the troll. I'm tempted to remove a lot of this very nonsensical discussion. Equazcion •✗/C • 18:42, 2 Mar 2008 (UTC)
- You know what... when I woke up, I said to myself "today, I want to be called a troll." Thanks a bunch. Basketball 110 _{what famous people say} ♣ 18:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I removed the comments regarding Jimbo and the nonsense about the NBA and George W. Bush etc [1]. Please stick to actual, serious, relevant arguments. Equazcion •✗/C • 18:47, 2 Mar 2008 (UTC)

Holy Cow[edit]

http://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Wikinews_interviews_Uga_Man%2C_write-in_candidate_for_US_President —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uga Man (talk • contribs) 19:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What to include[edit]

Wikipedia Primary
Endorsement from John Carter
Interview with Wikinews
Wikinews Primary —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uga Man (talk • contribs) 02:57, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on the keep![edit]

Congratulations on earning the right to keep your own user page! I believe you've set an important precedent in Wikipedian Ethics. Someday, perhaps every Wikipedia editor will be allowed to have his, or her, or its own user page. And every one of them may, someday, run for president of the United States, regardless of race, creed, color, sex, political party or national origin. Go Uga Man!

By the way, I hope that if you're elected president, you will remember those who supported you[2]. I could really use a four-year government appointment where I have my own staff and make lots of money but don't have to do any actual work. Maybe I could be Secretary of Dreams? Wakedream (talk) 06:31, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Enigma ^msg! 06:33, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's rubbish and needs deleted this is a wikipedia not a cheap joke book we don't need comic relief we need facts about real objects i don't see why we should have a page "inteanded for humour"Charlieh7337 (talk) 00:23, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I find your comments to be ironic for obvious reasons. --Uga Man (talk) UGA MAN FOR PRESIDENT 2008 03:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:)[edit]

I ^Would vote for you. Save The Humans Talk :) 00:00, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]