User talk:Civis Romanus

Hello, Civis Romanus. You have new messages at Geaugagrrl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Beaumaris, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. --Addi hockey 10^e-mail 23:15, 27 November 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 13th century in Wales. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. --Addi hockey 10^e-mail 23:16, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, that's a funny village name! It looked like only a bunch of random characters! Please ignore the above warnings, I've crossed them out. My apologies! --Addi hockey 10^e-mail 23:30, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pen y Bryn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Leland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pen y Bryn

Just FYI, I've deleted Category:Source for information on "Old Pen y Bryn" site? and moved the content to Talk:Pen_y_Bryn as being more appropriate - plus this page was in that category which wasn't really appropriate. Cheers. Le Deluge (talk) 11:04, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I agreed at the time and dealt with the substantive matter in the article and on its talk page, but I didn't want to bite the other editor by deleting their category. Civis Romanus (talk) 11:38, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits in Sushmita Banerjee page

I will not allow something completely defamatory, illegal, immoral and unethical to happen in Wikipedia by a rogue profile. There is no person called Sushmita Banerjee. She had changed her name a long back. If you do not accept to the fact that she changed her name due to communal or other reasons, it is indeed shameful. Below are the authentic sources which prove the same. There is NO EXISTING SOURCE which disputes the fact that she had changed her name to Sayeda Kamala. Hence any other edit to this will be termed as illogical, unethical and immoral with reasons with vested interests. http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/south-asia/taliban-deny-hand-in-indian-authors-killing/article5100596.ece http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/504240/20130906/sushmita-banerjee-shot-dead-taliban-afghanistan-militants.htm http://www.daijiworld.com/news/news_disp.asp?n_id=187400 http://www.deccanherald.com/content/355663/bring-body-back-pleads-slain.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saumya.purkayastha (talk • contribs) 12:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SeeTalk:Sushmita Banerjee. Civis Romanus (talk) 14:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Civis Romanus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Civis Romanus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]