User talk:Clarknikolai

Welcome!

Hello, Clarknikolai, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Temple of the Sacred Lady Crayon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kateshortforbob _talk 11:53, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Temple of the Sacred Lady Crayon[edit]

The article The Temple of the Sacred Lady Crayon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A subject which does not appear to meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. I was unable to find any reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kateshortforbob _talk 11:53, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Temple of the Sacred Lady Crayon[edit]

The article The Temple of the Sacred Lady Crayon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to locate any significatn reliable source mentions to establish notability of this building.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 01:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Temple of the Sacred Lady Crayon[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Temple of the Sacred Lady Crayon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 02:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because It did exist.

I've now moved it to my User Space. I hope to discover some way of showing proof.

Hi Clark. WP:ITEXISTS is not enough, unfortunately. Was it ever reported on in any local papers or on radio? If so, can you add those links to the article? We have not been able to find any. Even if we do find proofs, any article on this place is unlikely to be more than a mere WP:STUB, and what I'd recommend, if you do find references, is that you add a paragraph to Music_of_Saskatchewan#Saskatoon. We could use a WP:REDIRECT so that a search for "The Temple of the Sacred Lady Crayon" directs readers there. best of luck, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Temple of the Sacred Lady Crayon for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Temple of the Sacred Lady Crayon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Temple of the Sacred Lady Crayon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bella Ciao! moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Bella Ciao!, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 18:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bella Ciao! concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bella Ciao!, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bella Ciao![edit]

Hello, Clarknikolai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bella Ciao!".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 14:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]