User talk:Cldsk

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Hanley (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarkTraceur was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Hanley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarkTraceur (talk) 03:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Cldsk, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MarkTraceur (talk) 03:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Hanley (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Hanley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 09:47, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Hanley (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Hanley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:45, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some questions

Your username is against Wikipedia policy, as it appears to be a company/organisation name. It also suggests the policy of conflict of interest and/or paid editing, as your username appears to be the same as [1], which is a website design company. Therefore, per Wikipedia's conflict of interest and paid editing policies, I urge you to answer the following:

Are you affiliated with the company [2]?
Do you have an external relationship with Robert Hanley, who you seem so keen on drafting an article about? If so, please disclose the nature of the relationship- are you being paid by him to create an article about him on this website?
How many different users are using this account? All you edit summaries on Draft:Robert Hanley use the phrase "we", implying multiple users are using the account- this is not permitted. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do website design (savio designs is my sole propietership, and Robert Hanley is a Church friend that I have had the honor of assisting with his website. Since they aren't too computer savy, they asked me to help them in getting an article on Wikipedia...they wrote the article and are giving me citations, I created the account to post it - but i am the only one with access to this account. Saviodesigns (talk) 23:44, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So they are a friend, but they're not paying you to write this article, correct? In which case you have a conflict of interest, please read WP:COI. You are therefore strongly discouraged from creating a page where you have COI, although not forbidden. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, they are not paying me to post it - i am just trying to help them out as he and his wife are not computer savy. Saviodesigns (talk) 23:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC) They have paid me for the website work I have done for them, but i told them i would be happy to post the article for them (without payment) - I didn't realize how time consuming of a task this would be. Saviodesigns (talk) 23:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So they paid you to do some work, and then you decided to create a Wikipedia article for them for free? Seems strange to me, but I'm willing to assume good faith and assume that's true. In which case, you still have a conflict of interest. Worth pointing out right now that I'm not an admin, so cannot unblock you- I'm just another user, who's trying to find out all the facts. I assume an admin will be along soon to review your request, and they'll no doubt review this conversation too. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:02, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate it - they paid me to add in a CMS to their existing site - due to all the time that it took, and since they are friends, I mentioned I would post the article for them - they wrote it/etc. I am simply submitting it for them as they aren't too comp savy. Thanks for the info though - it is the first thing I have tried to post on Wikipedia - I didn't realize how complicated it would be. Saviodesigns (talk) 00:11, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Cldsk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

cldsk (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

my apologies, i didn't realize that name wasn't allowed Saviodesigns (talk) 23:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:51, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Hanley has been accepted

Robert Hanley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 01:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]