User talk:Clementdupuis
Welcome
[edit]Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see:
- Policy on neutral point of view
- Guideline on spam
- Guideline on external links
- Guideline on conflict of interest
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and how to develop articles
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- Article wizard for creating new articles
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Dawnseeker2000 02:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I have been cleaning up your repeated additions of these links for a reason. External links are a bit of a maintenance problem here on Wikipedia and there are teams of people like myself that constantly patrol for low quality or spam-type links.
This is essentially what's happening here on this article. Your repeated insertions of the links won't work because of the large number of folks that patrol for these types of items.
If you feel like the links are worth of inclusion you have two options. The first is to simply at the links over at the Open Directory Project. The second option would be to bring the topic up on the talk page of that article and make the proposal. See what kind of response you get before adding those links in the article. That way the community can respond and help decide if they would be an improvement to the article.
Welcome to Wikipedia! Dawnseeker2000 02:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
March 2010
[edit]Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Certified Information Systems Security Professional. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dawnseeker2000 16:54, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Certified Information Systems Security Professional. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk) 16:58, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 17:12, 12 March 2010 (UTC)- Clementdupuis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 89.101.129.145 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Using Wikipedia for spam or advertising purposes
Decline reason: The key phrase in your request below is "my site." At Wikipedia, we all avoid writing about or linking to our own web sites. Don't worry; if your site is truly the best source of information, it is inevitable that other users will cite it, and if you aren't interested in helping create the encyclopedia in any way other than linking to your own web site, then you don't need an active Wikipedia account at this time. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:24, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Obviously there is something wrong in your evaluation of the link that I am providing. First of all they are not advertisement. They are link pointing to free resources that CISSP's can use. Do a search in Google of CISSP Study and you will see that my site is listed as the first site and has been for many years. A web site like www.cissp.com is a commercial website and it is listed, that does not make sense. Have you taken one minute of your time to visite http://www.freepracticetests.org and www.cccure.org? You would see that it is NOT commercial advertising. My site is recommended by ISACA, it is recommended by Information Security magazine, it is recommended by Microsoft, and over 1000 other website that have links pointing to my websites. I am not sure how you did your validation but obviously there is a serious mistake here.}}