User talk:Code4Coffee

September 2018

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Twistlock (company), from its old location at User:Code4Coffee/sandbox/Twistlock (company). This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 17:46, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Twistlock (company) (November 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HighKing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability. Most of the references are based on funding announcements, others rely extensively on interviews with connected persons.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Twistlock (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Twistlock (company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HighKing⁺⁺ 12:47, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Code4Coffee! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HighKing⁺⁺ 12:47, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@HighKing: thank you for reviewing my article. This is the first article I've written from scratch to the English Wikipedia. I've read your notes and I thoroughly went through WP:NCORP. I made revisions to the article, specifically removing some of the references with interviews, and adding more references that fit the notability criteria. I left the references related to funding or PRs but they are only used for information regarding funding and anything else is based on neutral sources. The references I believe prove the most notability are the recent ones from SDxCentral, InfoWorld and the Forrester research that I've added.

I hope you can reconsider the rejection or aid me in improving the quality of the article before approval. I'll try my best for this article and for the next ones.

P.S. I originally left a shorter message on the draft itself, but I read you prefer to reply to you directly here on your user page.

Hi Code4Coffee, I've reviewed the latest edits and the new references. The Forrester Research references is excellent but it is the only reference that meets the criteria for establishing notability - the others do not. Usually though, once one analyst firm includes the company in a research report, the others follow suit fairly quickly. Can you perhaps locate coverage by another analyst/research company? Even with one reference though, since it is from an analyst firm and taking into account some of the other references, some leeway can be shown and therefore the article is ready to be accepted. Just if you can locate another, it cannot be challenged so I thought I'd ask you first. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:44, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@HighKing: Thank you, I appreciate the improvement to the article you authored. I ran a search to find more reports similar to the Forrester one, and I found a market report on Twistlock by 451 Group. The report was written by Fernando Montenegro, an information security analyst. I don't have access to the document so I can't tell it's exact release date, although the document summary in the website is comprehensive. Do you reckon it can increase notability if we quote it in the article?
Meanwhile, the article was rejected on notability basis by K.e.coffman (talk · contribs). If you are reading this as well, I'd appreciate any commentary that could help me and other reviewers understand the basis of the decision. Thank you. --Code4Coffee (talk) 11:19, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Twistlock (company) (December 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Please also see WP:TOOSOON and WP:PROMO.

K.e.coffman (talk) 02:44, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Code4Coffee. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Twistlock (company), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:46, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Twistlock (company)

Hello, Code4Coffee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Twistlock".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]