User talk:Cognoscente18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Cognoscente18! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Button sig.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Epeefleche (talk) 06:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Hi, Cognoscente18, I've re-instead your edit to CAMERA, as the reason for its deletion appears to me to be bogus. However, some statements are not supported by citations, so I think you should either find the citations or remove the contentious statements. cojoco (talk) 20:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

AN/I report[edit]

Please note that I have made a report to WP:AN/I regarding the edit warring / WP:BLP issue concerning Rashid Khalidi, here: WP:AN/I#Historicist edit warring on BLP violations. This is a courtesy notice only because you seem to have been involved in some edits or discussion on the subject recently. Thanks, Wikidemon (talk) 22:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

November 2009[edit]

Information.svg Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Paul Robeson. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:20, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

December 2009[edit]

I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 23:16, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Satmar edits[edit]

Thanks, good NPOV fix ups. Keep up the good work.--Shmaltz (talk) 01:09, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Red Baiting[edit]

On 5 December 2010 you wrote:

Usage note: it would appear that the term "red-baiting" is used much more often by communists, other left-wingers, and their supporters, than by conservatives. So it often tells us more about the person who uses the term than about the person who is accused of "red-baiting."

I think you should repost your above comment on the red baiting talk page. I agree with it and would welcome the opportunity to respond. I 03:09, 6 December 2010 (UTC)