User talk:Cupcake-Yum

Welcome!

Hi Cupcake-Yum! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Jalen Folf (talk) 04:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cupcake-Yum, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Jalen Folf (talk) 04:22, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cupcake-Yum. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 06:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cupcake-Yum (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Mz7 please can you unblock me , I just help Santiago-48 to his article I'm sorry cause I helped that user to the page of Mohammed Bzeek, but I'm not he's sock poppet

Decline reason:

Just saying you're not a sockpuppet is not anywhere near enough to convince us you're not, not when we have technical evidence. And speaking of "not anywhere near enough", I think from your limited English you may not be competent to edit here on the English Wikipedia. I really think you should consider editing your native language Wikipedia for now.

I have gone to the trouble of commenting out your other unblock requests, save the last one, for the time being (another sign to me that you're in over your head, to be honest). — Daniel Case (talk) 18:27, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Cupcake-Yum (talk) 08:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have four unblock requests open, when only one is needed. Please combine your requests into a single request. If you have additional comment, it should be made as a standard, unformatted comment. 331dot (talk) 08:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okau Cupcake-Yum (talk) 09:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cupcake-Yum (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Mz7 please can you unblock me , I just help Santiago-48 to his article I'm sorry cause I helped that user to the page of Mohammed Bzeek, but I'm not he's sock poppet And also I just wanted to help an article from deletion and can you help me to make a good edit not a bad edit to these online encyclopedia to make me avoid some bad user like Santiago-48, thanks 😊👍

Decline reason:

See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:40, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Cupcake-Yum (talk) 09:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You still have multiple unblock requests open; only one open request is needed at a time. Please combine them or remove all but one. 331dot (talk) 10:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cupcake-Yum (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay, but please make some expiration to my blocked accounts, I think a 1 year, I can deal with it, from now on I will study a book that has a notable person Cupcake-Yum (talk) 00:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppet. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:40, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.