User talk:CyclePat

---

Welcome to my talk page! Please visit my company's webpage at CyclePat.ca.

History - Archives by permanent link

• A-101: Sep 2005 - Jan 29 2006
• A-102: Jan 29 2006 - Jan 13 2007
• A-103: Jan 13 - April 10 2007
• A-105: Apr 13 - May 29 2007

In Ottawa it is currently Saturday 6 July, 07:31 (EDT).

"I may eventually get back to you. However, if it's past midnight, I might be sleeping! Shssh! Type quietly."

Here's a great idea

Try this: never mention AMA ever again, anywhere on Wikipedia, to anybody, not even in private conversations. See if you can do that. Guy (Help!) 21:27, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Cycle.....

CyclePat, Pelase stop bringing me up in the issue to restore the AMA. I did nothing wrong, and I had the support of the community as well. I don't iwsh to be in a dispute with you. Everything was for the good of Wikipedia and is fully in good faith. Please live and let live and move on to other more positive and worthwhile things then the AMA before this gets any bigger. (There is plenty to do on Wikipedia not just AMA) Good luck. Æon ^{Insanity Now!} 21:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Well

The thing is, Pat, you are a good user. That's why you've been given alot of leeway. But that goodwill can go away if you continue. As Guy said, just avoid AMA. I know you have alot of interests. Go back to one of them. I've had disagreements with you in the past, but you are a good user and a good man. Just steer clear from trouble for awhile. Wikipedia is vast. There's lots out there that you can help with. Try one of the cleanup projects. --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 23:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you Woohookitty, I have been trying to clean the project sticking to the main idea "Sources" "references" and "no original research". But, 1, 2 & 3 people with similar ideas (all posting in a row on my talk page). I once had someone warn me about my X-girl friend but didn't listen. This seems even more complicated than that! (lol) :) (seriously though, that was a sad story if ever you want to hear it send me an email). If that's the case I should be on a jet plane or, running, swimming, flying whatever the other way! Despite this fact, there is a particular something that keeps me from leaving the AMA too quickly. I think I may have expressed it on JzG's page. Thank you again Woohoo. --CyclePat 23:37, 30 May 2007 (UTC) p.s.: Hopefully, if I'm ever blocked in the future for something "disruptive" it's not for more than 72 hours (boy that last block felt long).

Wikipedia:Historical Pages

Pat, it's dead. Trying again under different names isn't going to change anything. --Calton | Talk 00:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

The AMA

Cycle, IT IS DEAD. Let it rest in peace before the community steps in and does something about it. They have already said it is dead and basily said good ridence. Trying to bring it up again and again and again is only going to make this into a bigger production than it already has become. So let it rest......the AMA was basicly on life support and the community pulled the plug on AN/IÆon ^{Insanity Now!} 01:48, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Due to your essay, it appears that you don't wish to assume good faith. As a result I hav efiled this RfC on you. Please review it thankyou Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Cyclepat Æon ^{Insanity Now!} 02:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

• OK, that's it. [1] is the last straw, I'm afraid. With a heavy heart I have blocked you for disruption and trolling; I will be more than happy to unblock you as soon as you give a categorical undertaking to cease your campaign in respect of AMA. It has gone way past the point of a well-intentioned annoyance. Guy (Help!) 21:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)