User talk:Dakshisdaksh

September 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Brightlands School has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Brightlands School was changed by Dakshisdaksh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892716 on 2020-09-29T12:34:02+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:54, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. [1] Ravensfire (talk) 20:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain me whatever you are trying to say.Dakshisdaksh (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dakshisdaksh, you're spamming links to truemaths.com. It's not a reliable source by Wikipedia standards and you've added links to a fair number of articles, giving the appearance that you're promoting the website. Please don't do that. Wikipedia is not the place to promote a website. Ravensfire (talk) 21:42, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so you wanna say that Truemaths is not a good website, to add Citations. The article heading says that Add secondary citations. It is one of the first Websites coming up when we search for the school. I thought it might be a great non-primary source. Plus I was very happy that I could add citations, so, sorry. Tell me what kind of citations we should have from Non-primary sources.Dakshisdaksh (talk) 17:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC)Dakshisdaksh[reply]

Dakshisdaksh, please read the Reliable Sources page for information on the kinds of sources that are considered good sources. Truemaths is a self-published site (a blog, based on Wordpress). There's no oversite of what's published, it's a commercial site and the articles are there to promote what they do. You can also use the [[WP:RSN|reliable source noticeboard}} to bring a specific example of cite on an article for other editors to review. Do you have a connection to this site in any way? You seem very interested in pushing this website. Ravensfire (talk) 18:16, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks Ravensfire. So can I ask you which is good and not good on your TALK-PAGE?? That would be a great help. Thanks.