User talk:Danp2006

This is Danp2006's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Police Organization (October 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at International Police Organization instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Police Organization and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 02:41, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Danp2006! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Star Mississippi 02:41, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Danp2006. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page International Police Organization, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:47, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rosguill, thank you for your msg... with all due respect, i am from Slovenia and like many other Slovenians we are very much aware of all articles about IPO in Slovenia.

however i was only editing - adding what is known and is supported by the relevant sources (like: media articles, official UN website, ... ) i did not posted any false information... only the ones that are facts and can be verified...

i have read and watched many media articles (over 25) about IPO in Slovenia especially about their work during the recent floods... at that time the organization has gathered and distributed record amount of humanitarian aid (even more than ICRC and Karitas together)... so i only tried to cite those articles...

of course there were some articles that are discrediting the organization (which i am not here to judge)... i did a research on that and out of over 40 articles, i could only find one source (BIRN) that was only cited 2 or 3 times that has negative tone of writing.... i think Wikipedia page should include both good and bad references... and than people can decide or create opinion.

so my question goes... am i allowed to contribute to the page and add information that are proven facts and supported by credible references?

have a great festive December Danp2006 (talk) 15:26, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]