User talk:Danylstrype

Greetings!

Hallo there, Danylstrype! I certainly "recognised your name as a fellow contributor to the sadly missed Bohème Magazine"! :-) And had wondered whether you might have been active at Indymedia Aotearoa ... now, having seen your page here, I know that you are. Also, I was heartened to see that Indymedia Aotearoa remains active, despite so many others having fallen away. I was moved to contemplate what it is that enables a movement to become a permanent institution, as Wikipedia may yet succeed in doing, bucking a very strong contrary trend in activist movements. (For example, since moving to Mildura on the Murray River some two-and-a-half years ago – and six hours away from Melbourne, I no longer try to help the Melbourne PC User Group totter along (ever more feebly it seems) despite having been involved there for about 30 years!) Do you have any blinding insights? ;-) yoyo (talk) 10:40, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Fediverse

Hi, I'm JamesG5. Danylstrype, thanks for creating Fediverse!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Research shows there is some notability, but this piece needs sources to show it. It also needs to be added to categories. I'll add some sources to the talk page that can be used to expand it.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

JamesG5 (talk) 20:24, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote

Dear Danylstrype,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 05:12, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Announcing WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Dear Wikipedians and contributors, the open source Wikipedia review tool, previously "WikiLoop Battlefield" has completed its name vote and is announcing its new name: WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Read the full story on the program page on Meta-wiki, learn about ways to support this tool, and find out what future developments are coming for this tool.

Thank you to everyone who took part in the vote!

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 18:30, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Hi Danylstrype,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

Thank you for working on the Fediverse article!

Great job keeping the article up to date. Enterprisey (talk!) 09:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

+1 thanks Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:36, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comparison of software and protocols for distributed social networking, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AGPL. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

HI Danylstrype,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The True School moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The True School. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 14:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that was quick. I was just loading some sources into the talk page, and planning to integrate them into the article tomorrow. Can you comment on how well these would address the concern that made you unpublish the article? Danylstrype (talk) 14:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]