User talk:Daquios

None

Image copyright problem with Image:Dagv.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dagv.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags.

HOW CAN THERE BE A PROBLEM!!!!!!!?????? I TOOK THE PICTURE MYSELF!!

You still have to tag it. Something like {{GFDL-self}} maybe ? -- PFHLai 10:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ghioane04.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ghioane04.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 12:05, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Beyondallreason_270.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Beyondallreason_270.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:39, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Wordsofbetrayal.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wordsofbetrayal.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during October 20 2006 to Kbdank71[edit]

Your recent edits are considered vandalism, they have been reverted and you are being warned to stop this behavior now. Such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly. You may continue editing, but unless all future edits are constructive you will be blocked without further warning. Glen 15:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism!?!? What vandalism? Give me an example...

Edits like this for example. Blanking pages without good reason is considered vandalism. – Tivedshambo (talk) 13:04, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable band[edit]

A tag has been placed on Battle street, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. – Tivedshambo (talk) 13:00, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond All Reason[edit]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Beyond All Reason, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Dane ^~nya 08:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to SpikeOut, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – Alex43223^{T | C | E} 10:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to David Cameron has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 01:17, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]