User talk:Dark droid

Image:Tut mask artlex.jpg has been listed as a possibly unfree image

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tut mask artlex.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Jim Apple 00:09, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi... you seem to be under the misguided notion that your talk page is another user page for you to erase comments and decorate with pictures while attacking people. You have a number of possibly unfree images from earlier that you already saw and erased, but if you want to be reminded of them, and the legal explanations for why they can't be here, see the page history. The Tut mask above was recent enough that it should remain.

Here's a new tagged image for you:

Image:The_rhine.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:The_rhine.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

It would be nice if you took the time to read about image policies here, didn't falsely accuse people of slander and so forth (on previous version of your talk page), and did not try to use your talk page to attack other editors. DreamGuy 15:10, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:RFM for a moderation request about you. Jim Apple 02:12, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dark Droid Temp Logo.jpg

This image has been flagged as being an orphaned (not used in any Wikipedia article) fair use (copyrighted image used under the fair use provision of United States law) image, and is subject to deletion under our criteria for speedy deletion (see Images, point five). Since you uploaded this image, I'd like to give you a final reminder that we either need the licensing information - you claim to have created it - or it will be deleted. Rob Church ^Talk 03:09, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ron Cobb Leviathan(Nostromo) Book of Alien.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ron Cobb Leviathan(Nostromo) Book of Alien.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nostromo in Alien.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nostromo in Alien.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dharma video clip.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dharma video clip.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dharma initiative logo video.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dharma initiative logo video.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hanso Foundation

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Hanso Foundation. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanso Foundation. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dharma Initiative for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dharma Initiative is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dharma Initiative until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]