User talk:Dass sundaram

Everything is up to the mark.

All info is correct

Draft:PrabalKumar Basu

You have been blocked for 24 hours for repeatedly moving Draft:PrabalKumar Basu back into mainspace. When this block expires, you are welcome to continue to edit the draft, but do not move it back to mainspace again until the problems identified at the AfD are fixed and a reviewer accepts the draft. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:27, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are not going through the article properly. This article has been cited properly with proper references. This article is original work and all informations are correct and up to the mark. Why are you deleting it without reading it properly? Dass sundaram (talk) 16:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Dass Sundaram[reply]

I have moved the article to the main space because this article is totally an original work and all references has been given properly. Without reading it you are just deleting it without any reason. Is this your standard? Can't you verify the article neutrally, being impartial? Why are you deleting the article without any reason. Read it properly and open all the reference links then you will understand all informations are correct. Dass sundaram (talk) 16:56, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Dass sundaram[reply]

I hope you will reply ASAP. Dass sundaram (talk) 16:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Dass Sundaram[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prabal Kumar Basu (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If the awards he's won aren't notable and nobody of significance writes about him, how do you assert he is notable?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prabal Kumar Basu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Prabal Kumar Basu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 22:47, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dass sundaram! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 22:47, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]