User talk:DavidReyAlvite

Welcome!

Hello, DavidReyAlvite, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like A Happening In Central Park, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! FlyingToaster 22:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of A Happening In Central Park[edit]

A tag has been placed on A Happening In Central Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. FlyingToaster 22:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Posición en España de If I were a Boy[edit]

Por qué cambias reiteradamente la posición de IIWAB en España???? Afortunadamente tenemos un Top 50 oficial que recoge VENTAS, ye n el cual IIWAB ha sido #4 y es Platino con más de 40mil copias vendidas. No veo motivo por el cual tienes q poner la lista de los 40 principales como posición en España, ya que dicha lista, además de ser un chiste movido por dinero, no es NADA oficial ni es la lista de singles de este país. Te agradecería por tanto que no lo vuelvas a cambiar. Gracias. Rub rb (talk) 18:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Bad Charts[edit]

The Los 40 Principales is listed on WP:BADCHARTS because it is the airplay chart for a single network. PROMUSICAE publishes the official charts for Spain, and those are already included. Please do not include the Los 40 Principales chart, or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS, in any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 13:53, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2010 (U.S.)[edit]

Please do not update chart information unless you also update the source. Using the same source link from the prior week [1] is not acceptable for these articles. Please also use the "show preview" button to make sure that the formatting is correct. Thanks. - eo (talk) 12:11, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Positive" vandalism[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2009 (U.S.), you may be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 19:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2009 (U.S.), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - eo (talk) 22:43, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re:Hot 100 2009[edit]

It did not chart that way and was listed in Billboard as "and" through its entire chart run, as have all the singles from Jay-Z's most recent album. The focus of that article is Billboard therefore it should remain credited correctly as was shown by the magazine. - eo (talk) 22:50, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First, no one is talking about canceling your account, so I don't know where you are getting that idea. The consensus on the "Empire" song article is to have it as featuring (it went back and forth several times). Lil Wayne is featured on "Down" and was listed that way in Billboard. See here [2] and [3] - eo (talk) 23:03, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a special code - both + and & symbolize the word "and". Usually it is & but for some reason Jay-Z's recent singles are using +. The other songs from The Blueprint 3 have also shown + in Billboard ("On to the Next One" and "Young Forever"). Billboard lists artists credits based upon how the artists' management and record labels tell them. That's why, for example, "Right Round" charted with only Flo Rida (no Ke$ha). - eo (talk) 23:31, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:16, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect information - stop[edit]

Although it's good that you are providing a source, please pay attention to the text within the source you're adding and the edit summaries left by other editors, when your additions are reverted. Thanks. - eo (talk) 11:45, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2010 (U.S.) ‎[edit]

Hi. Please don't do this: [4]. If you're going to add the new number-one single, please make sure you have a source, even if it is a temporary one. Here [5] I've linked directly to the 09/11 chart (for the time being) and then that can be replaced once Billboard publishes their weekly chart analysis (so it matches the prior weeks). Thanks. - eo (talk) 11:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Katy Perry discography, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. You must provide reliable sources when you change peaks. Otherwise, your edits will be considered unverifiable and reverted. Thanks. Yves (talk) 23:16, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited 2001, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2000s (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marie Antoinette with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Flyer22 (talk) 22:44, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of Billboard Hot 100 number-one singles of 2015[edit]

Do not add stylized text to this page, which causes a redirect. Thanks. - eo (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at List of Billboard Hot 100 number-one singles of 2015. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 19:00, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not stylized, it's written that way in Billboard and in the single picture. If "What's my Name?" has a "?" in Wikipedia "Uptown Funk!" must have a "!" too.

I do agree with DavidReyAlvite here. It shows with an exclamation point on the Hot 100 (I brought up the April 18, 2015 chart for this purpose, where it's at #1). MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:12, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He is placing a exclamation point which causes the wikilink to redirect. I've already asked that he stop doing this and he continues, now for the fourth time. If you do not like the way the title is formatted, gather a consensus at Talk:Uptown Funk to have it renamed. - eo (talk) 19:31, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the edit. DavidReyAlvite, this should be discussed on the talk page for the song, and consensus achieved, to include the punctuation. MPFitz1968 (talk) 00:12, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For the record I agree the ! should be there; I've added my support to the discussion. - eo (talk) 11:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Expecting to Fly (song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. LongLiveMusic (talk) 23:12, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, DavidReyAlvite. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, DavidReyAlvite. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, DavidReyAlvite. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, DavidReyAlvite. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]