User talk:Dberks

Dberks, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Dberks! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chicago Toy & Game Group (July 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eddie891 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

needs more independent sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:45, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Group has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Group. Thanks! — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:58, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chicago Toy & Game Group (August 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The notability of the group hinges entirely on the event, it is not independently notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:43, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Group has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Group. Thanks! — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:03, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chicago Toy & Game Week (June 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by In Memoriam A.H.H. was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article reads like a promo for the event. Please refer and use WP:NPOV when changing the prose.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Week and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Week, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

In Memoriam A.H.H.^{What, you egg?}. 18:07, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments at my talk page.[edit]

Hi there Dberks. You stated at my talk page to outline which of the prose to change. I would suggest rewriting the Star Wars Luncheon section, reword the lead on the Toy and Game Innovation Awards, and also reword the Conferences section. However, even if you reword everything I said. You still have not shown that the event is notable enough to have an article dedicated to its self. You can do that by implementing good reliable secondary sources into the article before submission, such as a well-published newspaper, or a well-known reliable news website. Please refer to WP:RSE for help. Have a nice day. In Memoriam A.H.H.^{What, you egg?}. 16:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]