User talk:Debapriya sen
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you.
April 2021
[edit] Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Pappammal. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 05:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Vikas Khanna, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. 04:50, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sindhutai Sapkal, you may be blocked from editing. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 19:41, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bishonen | tålk 10:43, 10 April 2021 (UTC)I have gone through the guidelines of adding References and External links. It is disheartening to find that my articles seem to be disruptive but I assure that I have Good Intentions and my articles have an even greater motto. My articles are totally related to the content of wikipedia where my links have been provided and my writings are in general,biographical in nature. I try to give my best for creating Good and Rich Content so that people can get to Learn something new and get a Positive credo in Life to strive for Ideals by knowing and observing an Achiever deeply.I was extremely happy to find that my articles are also a contributor in Wikipedia and that I'm getting an even bigger platform. You can go through my articles, and check for irrelevancy of content, maybe there's some misunderstanding.Hoping to get a clearer picture, if still anything is going wrong from my side.
Thanks, Debapriya Sen
Debapriya sen (talk) 18:14, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, Debapriya sen. I can't see that you have created any articles here. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding what you say. All this account has done at Wikipedia is add links to a Wordpress blog, which is not an appropriate source for Wikipedia. We use only reliable secondary sources; not self-published material such as Wordpress. Since all your contributions are links to this blog, I'm afraid the impression is that you are here to promote the blog — to use Wikipedia to get a "bigger platform", as you say. You can't do that, no matter how much it teaches a positive credo. That's why you have been getting all the warnings I see above. I blocked you because you disregarded the warnings. Bishonen | tålk 18:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC).