User talk:Denereri

Vanguard Youth (Vietnam)

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Vanguard Youth (Vietnam), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Vanguard Youth. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 09:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

changing article titles

When you want to to change an article title, like you did at pogača, please don't copy&paste and instead use the Move page function. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 21:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Simit may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:54, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zaza people - needs consensus and was a copyright violation

This needs agreement on the talk page. Please don't try to change spelling like this without agreement. Also, it was obviously copied from another source and thus a copyright violation. But you need agreement for a name change. Dougweller (talk) 18:49, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Tzatziki. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:35, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Cacık shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 08:03, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Cacık shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
And you also continue with your WP:OR additions and use of synthetizing. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 15:37, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cacık, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ottoman Turkish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Your recent editing history at Tzatziki shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 19:20, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is a user generated source and so fails our reliable sourcing guidelines. Do not cite Wikipedia on Wikipedia. Plus, Cacık#Etymology does not actually say that Tzatziki is etymologically related. When you cite a source, do not elaborate, add, or otherwise claim something that is not directly supported by the text. Paraphrase, and that's all. Before reverting again, start a discussion at Talk:Tzatziki, or you'll be very likely to be blocked for edit warring. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:24, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cacık may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

> while Armenian ''{{transl|hy|ALA-LC|taghdz}}'' ({{lang|hy|դաղձ}}) refers to [[mint]].{{Citation needed|date=September 2014} The suffix ''-ık'' is Turkish and is related to Armenian ''-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:40, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]