User talk:Detroitwheel

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to West Memphis 3, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: West Memphis 3 was changed by Detroitwheel (u) (t) deleting 14001 characters on 2009-03-01T20:46:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to the page West Memphis 3 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Shawnpoo (talk) 20:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to West Memphis 3. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Shawnpoo (talk) 21:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to West Memphis 3. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 03:59, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to West Memphis 3, you will be blocked from editing. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 15:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to West Memphis 3, you will be blocked from editing. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 02:54, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've blocked you from editing because I don't think you quite get what Wikipedia is for. Your edits to our encyclopedia are unconstructive, and others are having to clean up after you.

I'm going to leave you a welcome message here. Please please read the links. If you come back after the block and haven't read and heeded the links, the next block you get may well be permanent. For more information on this, see

If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Please bear in mind that any admin reviewing this block may or may not unblock or extend this block at their discretion.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); Kralizec! (talk) 03:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --aktsu ^(t / c) 20:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to West Memphis 3. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Versus22_talk 20:18, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to West Memphis 3. Versus22_talk 20:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Toddst1 (talk) 20:47, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]