User talk:Dhun9265

Welcome!

Hello, Dhun9265, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 02:43, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BAITSSS (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All the refs are either own refs as the developers of the model or academic papers from researchers who have used the model but nothing that discusses and analyses the benefits of the model in a reliable and independent way. I also have concerns that the diagram is a copyright violation

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BAITSSS and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BAITSSS, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 00:53, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dhun9265! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Velella ^{Velella Talk} 00:53, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declare any connection

Hello, Dhun9265. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:BAITSSS, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:11, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the comment. I know about BAITSSS as I am in the same field, so I developed the page and some of my friends in the same field edited. After your comments, the text and citations had been significantly reduced, I would appreciate your comments.

Dhun9265, your username resonates with the researcher central to the BAITSSS article. This conflict of interest requires disclosure. Furthermore, there is evidence of sockpuppetry, with Dhun9265 last editing 19OCT2019, and new user IDKANS first editing the BAITSSS article on 06NOV2019. Sock puppetry includes logging out to make problematic edits as an IP address, such as when 24.255.215.102 engaged in (1) editing the BAITSSS article starting on 09NOV2019, (2) editing Dhungel on 26NOV2019 to promote the individual central to the BAITSSS article, and (3) editing irrigation-related article 'See also' lists on 18DEC2019 to promote BAITSSS. Lacking further disclosure, it is reasonable to conclude that the BAITSSS article is mostly the work of the individual central to the article, and further to conclude that promotion of this individual's interests is fundamental to the effort to develop the BAITSSS article content and publish it on Wikipedia. -- Paleorthid (talk) 20:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the comments. From initial layout of this article, I have some contribution on development of this article. As I mentioned earlier a year ago, I developed this article based on the knowledge of the subject. I am neither wiki expert nor have any individual interest. Dhun9265 is based on more what I found on the weblink on this subject. If it is not within the scope of wiki, it can be proposed for deletion or someone can significantly improve this for neutral point of view. Thanks.

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dhun9265, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Paleorthid (talk) 05:46, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The discussion is about the topic BAITSSS. Thank you. Paleorthid (talk) 00:59, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:15, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]