Jump to content

User talk:Digital Xanda Ltd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Lavalizard101. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gail's have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Phrases such as "best bakers in town" etc. are not suitable for Wikipedia Lavalizard101 (talk) 14:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:07, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Digital Xanda Ltd (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

From our understanding, the reason we have been blocked is that we are a digital marketing agency and we are paid to advertise for our clients. According to the purpose of Wikipedia, this goes against its guidelines. Because we are part of an agency, our account username represents a business and goes against the username policy. However, we can assure you that our purpose in editing GAIL's Wikipedia page is NOT for advertising purposes but is to update the general public on the history of GAIL's, as well as change the basic issues like the business name format. We believe this is in the interest of Wikipedia so that it is not promoting false information about a well-known UK company. If we are unblocked the contributions we intend to make are to rectify the way the business' name is formatted (from Gail's to GAIL's) to properly reflect the business branding. We also intend to provide a full and meaningful history of a much-loved UK company, as well as provide up-to-date images.

Decline reason:

the primary reason you are blocked is for promotional editing. Cutting-and-pasting from Gail's "about us" page is entirely that. If information needs to be corrected, it's not for the subject's marketing agency -- by definition tasked with promotion of the subject -- to make those corrections. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 17:15, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just to make it clear, the subject of a Wikipedia article (a person, a business, etc.) has no right of ownership or control over the Wikipedia article about it. Article content consists of paraphrased summaries of material previously published in reliable sources that are independent of the article's subject. The content is expressed in a plainly factual and neutral point of view. We have no interest in what a company wishes to say about itself. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:14, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon: Thanks for your reply. I have added the data from the about us page, as I found it more accurate. If I need to rephrase any wording, it will be absolutely fine, I appreciate your advice. The page name is spelt wrongly, can you please update it to 'GAIL's Bakery'? Also, I need to update the text too. I have been looking at Cafe Nero and Costa as well, it is quite similar and I am not sure why our edit has been removed. It is not about promotions, We are adding more data about GAIL's and I think this is what Wikipedia is for, to deliver accurate data about everyone and every place that the users are interested in. Please let me know what actions I can take to fix the issue.Digital Xanda Ltd (talk) 12:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Digital Xanda Ltd: Please place new postings at the bottom of the page to ensure that the discussion flows in the correct chronological order. Your original positioning was confusing and messed up the existing notification at the top, so I moved it down.
If you want something in this article changed, your primary concern should be to correct your username which currently violates Wikipedia's username policy. Secondly, you should make the proper and mandatory disclosure of paid editing if you are representing this business's interests. Thirdly, you should read what I already wrote above; content is dictated by what has been written about this business in reliable sources that have no financial interest in it. We have little interest in what the business itself wishes to say. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:34, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Digital Xanda Ltd (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

The current Username it seems it is against Wikipedia Policy.

Decline reason:

As you know, your username is only one small part of the problem here. Nothing here convinces me you'll abide by WP:COI and WP:PROMO and you haven't told us what you plan to write about instead. Yamla (talk) 12:41, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]