User talk:Dmhw

March 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chenghua (era) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chenghua (era) was changed by Dmhw (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892489 on 2023-03-10T09:39:56+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:39, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jiajing. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jiajing was changed by Dmhw (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912541 on 2023-03-10T09:44:27+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:44, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Li Jinglong, you may be blocked from editing. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 04:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Dorsetonian (talk) 18:35, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dmhw! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Wei Zhongxian several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Wei Zhongxian, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. AP 499D25 (talk) 00:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reported for vandalism

Hi, I have reported you to User:The Blade of the Northern Lights for vandalizing several articles, blanking pages, and displaying similar editing behavior to User:Ylogm, who was blocked recently for not being here to contribute to an encyclopedia. EchoAyatoZhao53 (talk) 01:05, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 01:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]