User talk:Doctorwhorox

Hello Doctorwhorox and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will helpful for you to be the good editor or perhaps even the best editor:

Just a quick note that you must not add copyrighted text, advertise or promotional material, or add text that is not included with that article. This gets you blocked from editing, which you don't want to be. Do not copy and paste material from any other website. Remember, Wikipedia has a neutral point of view. If you want editing tests, please use the sandbox, thank you.

I hope you enjoy being a wikipedian. The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the Wikipedia:Questions, add a question to the village pump, add a question to the help pages, ask me on my talk page, or put {{helpme}} on your talk page (this page) and then put your comment. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ it will automatically insert your signature and the date. Good luck and good editing. Cheers. -Porchcrop ^{(talk|contributions)} 01:48, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Nigel Rhodes

A tag has been placed on Nigel Rhodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. §FreeRangeFrog 01:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Lawrence (actor)

I very much enjoy the work of Roger Price so I was glad to see this article, but it is missing a crucial bit any article should have: references. Formatting isn't too important as long as other editors know where the information came from and as long as the source is reliable. (User:Uncle G/On sources and content may be of help too) - Mgm|^(talk) 11:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dean Lawrence (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dean Lawrence (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Lawrence (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 16:47, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]