User talk:Dough4872/Archive 2023

Happy New Year, Dough4872!

Happy New Year!

Dough4872,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Japan Airlines

Japan Airlines has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Femke (alt) (talk) 09:10, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Road FAC

Hello, I noticed that you have reviewed several of U.S. road FACs over the last several years. That being said, I have nominated Interstate 40 in Tennessee for FA status, and while one reviewer has indicated an intention to support pending a copyedit, the article is struggling to attract reviewers, and is at risk of being archived. The maps RfC seems to have dissuaded some road editors. Would you be interesting in taking a look at this review? Thanks. Bneu2013 (talk) 20:01, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Pennsylvania Route 237

Pennsylvania Route 237 has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:11, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback misuse

Hi Dough4872! You appear to have used rollback on a good faith edit here [1] which is abuse of the tool, rollback is only supposed to be used in specific situation. You can educate yourself about this at WP:ROLLBACKUSE. Note that using rollback is a privilege not a right and if you continue to abuse it the privilege will be taken away. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:NJTA logo.gif

A tag has been placed on File:NJTA logo.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Philroc (talk) 12:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, on the seaside resort page it states town, village, hotel. Should city be added? There are many seaside resort cities. I have added this on the talk page, if you could go on there? it would be great to hear what you think. Thank you. 78.86.136.232 (talk) 10:44, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Fall 2023

Volume 10, Issue 1 • Fall 2023 • About the Newsletter

Features

• A New Future for Road Articles Online

Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi 1979 → on 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

For canvasing related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M43 (Durban) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F102 highway (Nigeria), you have been blocked for a week. Since it is based on private information, this block counts as a Checkuser block. I am willing to share the evidence of canvasing with any CU who is reviewing the block. Additionally, the evidence has been sent to arbcom-en. You may appeal this block directly to arbcom or via the unblock template. -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 19:43, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Falmouth Spur

Hi there. I was hoping to tidy up the sentence above the table here, but it appears to be beyond me. Hoping you have some guidance. Seasider53 (talk) 21:05, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Queen Mary 2

Queen Mary 2 has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]