User talk:Dr.Ted Rothstein DDS PhD

Welcome!

Hello, Dr.Ted Rothstein DDS PhD, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 19:04, 10 May 2015 (UTC) @Dr. Ted Rothstein DDS PhD: some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. The sole object of the article cited is to promote the idea that for the first time in history I a dental professional am urging other dental professioanls to enlist themselves to assist their patients with weight control issue viz. compulsive overeating. Yes I invented one device, but my over-- arching goal in this reference is to inform the public that dental professionals have been put on the alert by me in this article and many, many others (do G-search 'orthodontic jaw wiring') that it behooves dental professionals because of their expertise to be part of the healthcare team that provides services to the obese/compulsive overeaters.Dr.Ted Rothstein DDS PhD (talk) 19:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Compulsive overeating because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Adding your own work as a reference gives at least the appearance that you are attempting to promote yourself. —C.Fred (talk) 19:04, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Compulsive overeating. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Agtx (talk) 22:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Compulsive overeating with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk) 23:04, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Agtx (talk) 23:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Dr.Ted_Rothstein_DDS_PhD reported by User:Agtx (Result: ). Thank you. Agtx (talk) 23:43, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Compulsive overeating

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Per Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Dr.Ted Rothstein DDS PhD reported by User:Agtx (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:43, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Ted Rothstein DDS PhD: Questions: 1. in citations if two authors must cite both? if 6 authors must cite all? et al. Ok? must I know html? can i cite in plain text?Dr.Ted Rothstein DDS PhD (talk) 23:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The {{citation}} will generate it for you after you fill in some blanks. That templates uses Wikipedia markup language; it's not full HTML. I believe there's a way to have it to et al for that many authors. It's a useful template, with a couple of variations. For instance, in citing news stories, I use {{cite news}}. The following code:

{{cite news | first=Lois | last=Lane | title=Superman saves the day again! | url=http://www.example.com/link_to_story.html | work=Daily Planet | date=April 1, 1956 | accessdate=May 13, 2015}}

generates the following output:

Lane, Lois (April 1, 1956). "Superman saves the day again!". Daily Planet. Retrieved May 13, 2015.

If you follow the links to either the citation or cite news templates, you can see the documentation on how to use them. —C.Fred (talk) 23:07, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{reply to | Dr. Rothstein DDS PhD]] My citation is: Alice E. Curran, et al. Dentists' Attitudes About Their Role in Addressing Obesity in Patients: A national survey JADA, V.11, p1307-1316, 2010., use template ^[1] isthis correct? how do I summon the template to fill to do the fill-ins?71.125.240.225 (talk) 23:51, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@71.125.240.225 and Dr.Ted Rothstein DDS PhD: The template you're looking for is {{Cite journal}}, not {{Cite journal article}}. Also, the {{Reply to}} template indicates who the message is addressed to; it's not a signature. —C.Fred (talk) 01:10, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: @Dr. Ted Rotstein DDS PhD: what/where is the template to cite/reference a page in wikipedia?Dr.Ted Rothstein DDS PhD (talk) 19:11, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Ted Rothstein DDS PhD: Which is the correct way to summon a Page in Wikipedia: jaw wiring or

Dr.Ted Rothstein DDS PhD (talk) 01:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC) [reply]

References

^ Curran, Alice; Smith, Ben; Mendy, Sara (2101). "Dentists' Attitudes About Their Role in Addressing Obesity in Patients: A national survey": 1307-1316. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Unknown parameter |Journal= ignored (|journal= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Volume= ignored (|volume= suggested) (help)

Speedy deletion nomination of Orthodontic jaw wiring

Hello Dr.Ted Rothstein DDS PhD,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Orthodontic jaw wiring for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Nicky mathew (talk) 11:06, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Vandalism" was clearly the wrong word, as was "hoax". However, the page was not an article about orthodontic jaw wiring, and comments about editing Wikipedia usually belong in talk pages, certainly not in articles, so the page has been deleted. I also note that you wrote "My goal has always been to provide information to colleagues (dental professionals) to encourage them to provide Orthodontic Jaw wiring for weight control issues" and "I invented the mechanics and the system for providing the service. I want to share it." However, those aims are incompatible with the purpose of Wikipedia. Posting a page for the purpose of encouraging people to use something, i.e. to promote it, is contrary to Wikipedia policy. I wish you every success in encouraging people to use your invention, but Wikipedia is not the place to do it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:06, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cite journal

as has been pointed out to you above, "The template you're looking for is {{Cite journal}}, not {{Cite journal article}}" Frietjes (talk) 22:29, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Curran, Alice; Smith, Ben; Mendy, Sara (2101). "Dentists' Attitudes About Their Role in Addressing Obesity in Patients: A national survey": 1307-1316. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Unknown parameter |Journal= ignored (|journal= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Volume= ignored (|volume= suggested) (help)

[1]