Jump to content

User talk:Dr. Mike Carper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Deb (talk) 21:39, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dr. Mike Carper (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I failed to read the posting guidelines. Now that I understand it, I won't repeat it. I would like to be unblocked so I can address the advertising aspects of the posting. My apologies.

Decline reason:

Given that your posting's entire point was to mention and link to the software you represent, which amounts to promoting it, you'll have to either agree not to edit Wikipedia in ways relating to HRD Software, widely construed, or explain how exactly you would "address the advertising aspects" if you were unblocked. On an unrelated note, please take a look at WP:PAID; you currently cannot edit your user page, but when you are unblocked you will need to comply with the disclosure requirements. Huon (talk) 22:56, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dr. Mike Carper (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

HRD Software is to Ham Radio Deluxe as Microsoft is to Word for Windows. The purpose of this article is to tell the story about Ham Radio Deluxe, not of HRD Software. People may not know HRD Software. But they ham radio operators do know Ham Radio Deluxe. They are interested in the history, what it does, and who has been involved. I will take out all the links related to promoting the product - such as the link to the website. That said, even Microsoft's entry on Wikipedia has the link for Microsoft in the references ("Official Website"). But I'll remove all such references from the article... reduce it to "Official Website"... and otherwise stay with the same format used for Microsoft... how it started... the brief history, what the software is... what it does... who uses it. The "who", "what", "when", "where" and "how"... without any marketing or sales references.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Superseded by new unblock request posted below. Please, do not make multiple unblock requests at the same time. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dr. Mike Carper (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I would like the opportunity to fix the problems with my entry, but I'm blocked from doing so. At that point, I believe it will be re-evaluated and we can see that the problems that caused this to be blocked have been resolved. What's next in the process?

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Superseded by new unblock request posted below. Please, do not make multiple unblock requests at the same time. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr. Mike Carper (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What are my next steps in getting unblocked? I have explained how I will address the advertising aspects of the posting. My intention is to "inform", not to promote.

Decline reason:

There is no difference between promoting a company and promoting its products. You will not be unblocked if your main purpose is to make COI edits (wp:COI: COI editing is strongly discouraged.) You wrongly assume that only posting links is promotion. "Tell[ing] the story about Ham Radio Deluxe", as you say, is the very definition of promotion. Yes, the Microsoft article does have link to official web site, but it was not posted by a Microsoft employee. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr. Mike Carper (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My objective is to remove any COI references and make it informational only. I'll take the links out, if that's what's best. I do not want it to be an advertisement. I seek only to correct it so that it is merely informational. I'm puzzled by the process here. I'm saying that I will correct it... but I'm blocked from doing so. What are my next steps to removing all the COI references?

Decline reason:

This unblock request has remained open for a while. The problem is, you have not convinced us you understand WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. So, rather than leaving this unblock request open indefinitely, I am declining it. I strongly suggest the only way you'll get unblocked is if you agree to refrain from editing any article for which you have a conflict of interest. That specifically means refraining from writing about ham radio. You would still be allowed to suggest edits on the article's talk page, after disclosing your conflict of interest. Yamla (talk) 11:31, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock | What's the status?}

{unblock|Can anyone tell me what I do next (besides the apologies and descriptions of what I've indicated I will do to address the COI aspects of the post)?}

{unblock | What can I do next?}

One unblock request at a time, please. The problem is, every admin who has reviewed your request has found it insufficiently convincing. I suggest you remove your unblock request and rewrite it, paying careful attention to WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. --Yamla (talk) 01:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock | Clearly I don't understand the process. I'm happy to remove my unblock request and rewrite it. How do I access it so that I can rewrite it?}