User talk:Dr Viewbook

Winged Helmet

Dr Viewbook's response: You make a valid point. A lot of material regarding American college football is largely hearsay. The concept that the wings allow for quarterbacks to better see receivers ready downfield has been copied by most helmets, but without three stripes, there is only one down the middle. An excellent example of this is University of Florida's football helmet. However, I'm finding difficulty explaining this (i.e. naming Florida as an example) while still sounding relevant. If there is a way to better explain it in the article, I'd appreciate any input or editing you can add. However, removing the entire point seems somewhat unnecessary. Regarding the citation, this is another valid point you raise. I recall seeing the winged helmet's history discussed on those pages of the college football encyclopedia, but there doesn't appear to be an online web source that is unbiased and reliable. I will continue to search for one, but none I find appears to be credible in the way Wikipedia desires.

I am going to ask you again to cite your sources on your addition to the winged helmet page.

Text such as: -Your winged helmet definition: "The winged football helmet is a helmet bearing a distinctive painted design that typically has sharp outward curves over the forehead and three stripes from it that go to the back" -"Interestingly enough, Michigan State University (an in-state rival to the University of Michigan) also makes a claim that it in fact started the winged helmet" -"These are sometimes interpreted as the helmet's "wings," which lead some to conclude that Crisler could not have designed the winged helmet. However, Crisler's design featured three stripes that went over the top of the head to the back of the helmet. It is possible that these are the "wings" Crisler and historians refer to because they have an actual impact between the quarterback and receivers" -"Numerous school and college football programs around the United States have adopted this same concept without necessarily adopting the "wings." Most helmets feature a single line that goes over the top of the head to the back of the helmet. The reason for this is the same as Crisler's wings: the quarterback sees the line as the receivers run down the field and, when the receiver turns his head, the line disappears, which means that the receiver is either ready to catch the ball or is completing his route. However, Crisler's winged helmet remains unique because it features three lines (or stripes) as opposed to one. The Michigan Wolverines have kept the helmet design since 1938." all needs to be cited. It looks like you have a very strong POV on the matter and citing the above will clear that up. And I am not talking about one citation that spans 20+ pages of a book, if you plan to inject the above text you need to be more specific.

BTW, I did not undo 2 hours of your work, by your timestamps, it was 15min.

I am not undoing your changes, instead inviting you to cite all the text above. If it is not cited properly with a reliable source, to keep Wikipedia accurate and to keep away POVs such as yours.

Imacericg (talk) 01:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Dr Viewbook! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Salvio Let's talk 'bout it! 22:47, 16 August 2010 (UTC) Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Nomination of Sabor (Tarzan) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sabor (Tarzan), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabor (Tarzan) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Honoré Théodoric d'Albert de Luynes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dampierre. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 21 December 2022 (UTC)