User talk:Drewskie2010
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Drewskie2010, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Cupcakke, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tgeairn (talk) 21:09, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Cupcakke
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Cupcakke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tgeairn (talk) 21:09, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hello! In addition to the above, which is a bit formal, I'd like to direct you to our criteria for musicians. This is a better explanation of the specific criteria for musicians. Cheers! --Tgeairn (talk) 21:17, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Cupcakke
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Cupcakke, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:17, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
In case the article gets deleted, my response to your remarks at Talk:Cupcakke are as follows. I'm including them so that you understand what notability requirements must be established when an article is created:
@C.Fred Thank you so much for looking into it further! She's also been mentioned by several other credible music publications such as Complex Magazine, Pitchfork, and Fader. I'd be able to provide the sources for those mentions if you'd like. Personally, I just think it would be unfortunate for people to see her name mentioned in all of those well known magazines, and not even be able to find any further information about her here on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewskie2010 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- Drewskie2010, "mentioned" is not the metric we use to determine notability. Significant coverage in these sources is the metric. Please see our general notability guideline. There's a big difference between a passing mention, and someone actually caring enough to write an in-depth article. Further, a deletion discussion was already held on this subject. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CupcakKe. This newest incarnation is not significantly improved over the article that was deleted. Please also see WP:NMUSIC, as those are the more specific guidelines for musicians. Until that time, I'm re-nominating for speedy deletion. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:12, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:21, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Deepthroat (song) redirect
[edit]Hi there, I've redirected Deepthroat (song) to Cupcakke. As previously noted, you need to establish a subject's notability when you create an article. Article subjects are not inherited, so even if Cupcakke is considered notable, not everything she creates deserves an article here. Audacious (CupcakKe album) is at risk of deletion for the same reason. Please see WP:NMUSIC, specifically in the areas where it addresses albums and singles. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:22, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cupcakke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cupcakke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TomStar81 (Talk) 10:26, 2 June 2018 (UTC)