User talk:Drwarden

April 2024

Hello, I'm Bigcheese26. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kevada Mosque without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bigcheese26 (talk) 15:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Champaner-Pavagadh Archaeological Park, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. -- Fyrael (talk) 15:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bawaman Mosque, you may be blocked from editing. -- Fyrael (talk) 15:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing the names of places in our articles, to different names to those used as our article titles, as you did at Aurangabad division. We use the "Common names" in English for our articles, not the "Official names", so changing the name breaks internal links to those articles, and is confusing to our readers - thank you -- Arjayay (talk) 15:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Jama Mosque, Ahmedabad. - Arjayay (talk) 12:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jama Mosque, Champaner, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 12:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that in this edit to Azim Premji University, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 03:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

After all the warnings above, you have persisted in disruptive editing, as in this tendentious removal of reliable sources. You have been blocked from editing for three months. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 14:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 15:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]