User talk:EMKHA6

April 2024

Hello, I'm Rsjaffe. I noticed that you recently removed content from Khalid Skah without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:30, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Khalid Skah, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. HaeB (talk) 06:54, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Khalid Skah, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Khalid Skah was changed by EMKHA6 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902218 on 2024-04-15T09:14:27+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lachielmao. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Khalid Skah, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Lachielmao (talk) 09:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Khalid Skah, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Please explain why you removed content and sources, without adding new ones. Saying the information is "available on the net" does not constitute as a source. Lachielmao (talk) 09:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did with this edit to Khalid Skah. Adakiko (talk) 09:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Khalid_Skah.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]