User talk:Ed Polgardy

Welcome

You have an obvious conflict of interest, writing about yourself is discouraged but not banned. Please read the guidance below:

When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. Some of your text is unreferenced, and some is sourced to unsuitable sites, like your own pages, interviews with you and the review site Goodreads. However, you appear to reach our notability threshold.
You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews. The text isn't too bad, but, for example, is internationally recognized really justified by an article in French?
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. This is the real stumbling block. You seem to be saying that the copied sites are claiming copyright on text they have stolen from you, that you would otherwise release here. That's a matter you must sort out with them, but your own website seems have the pages I've seen tagged ©2018 by Black Hat Magic Productions. That means they can't be copied here since we only accept text that's free to use for any purpose, including commercial. If I've overlooked a page you've released to us, please point it out, otherwise I'm afraid for legal reasons we don't restore copyright text. Basically, we can only verify your identity and ownership of the text if it's explicit on your website. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:09, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak: Hi Jim. Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. I added the "Creative Commons Public Domain 1.0 license" to my web site, so the text I created for my "About Ed Polgardy" page (https://www.edpolgardy.com/about) is now in the public domain and should be able to be used here on Wikipedia. Since you said "The text isn't too bad" in your response to me, I would like to get the page back up on Wiki as a draft document so I can make whatever revisions I have to make to get it published. Is this possible now that I took the copyright notice off of my bio? Looking forward to hearing back from you! Ed Polgardy (talk) 22:32, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ed Polgardy (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NoahDavid771 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ed Polgardy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ed Polgardy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah!^💬 16:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ed Polgardy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noah!^💬 16:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ed Polgardy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ed Polgardy. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 15:54, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ed Polgardy (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nightenbelle were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources do not establish notability enough to prove subject deserves and article. Significant portions of the article are entirely unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ed Polgardy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ed Polgardy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 19:50, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ed Polgardy

Hello, Ed Polgardy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ed Polgardy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:43, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]