User talk:Editorjummy
Welcome!
[edit]![A plate of chocolate chip cookies.](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg/220px-Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg)
Hello, Editorjummy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! ҉N҉҉X҉҉c҉҉r҉҉y҉҉p҉҉t҉҉o҉ Message 05:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
June 2024
[edit] Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:OneStream Live, from its old location at User:Editorjummy/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @SafariScribe I am grateful to you. As a quick look, can you make your appropriate edits to the article, review the sources, and give your opinion? Thank you Editorjummy (talk) 06:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- I will try that shortly but not assuring. Also from you contributions, I saw you go around people's talk page seeking help. Though it isn't bad but it gets irritating when it for same less edit. If you reached out one editor, try the WP:TEAHOUSE to ask experienced editors on which way forward. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- @SafariScribeI really appreciate your cooperation in this matter. I will not ask anyone else to review the page because you are an experienced and experienced editor. I hope you will take a look soon. Editorjummy (talk) 06:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- I will try that shortly but not assuring. Also from you contributions, I saw you go around people's talk page seeking help. Though it isn't bad but it gets irritating when it for same less edit. If you reached out one editor, try the WP:TEAHOUSE to ask experienced editors on which way forward. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Editorjummy. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:OneStream Live, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:27, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- @SafariScribe Hello, I have nothing to do with the topic at all. I loved editing here and writing, and I write about several topics - I never take any compensation Editorjummy (talk) 06:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I know, I can only write about facts and sources Editorjummy (talk) 06:31, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oh! No problem just that it's unlikely for you to have seriously partake in creating this article. There is no issue at all. Like I said, ignore the message. So I will see the draft through and list subsequent comment you need if it meets WP:NCORP. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- ok @SafariScribe thank you so much Editorjummy (talk) 06:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @SafariScribe what is your idea about the article and sources can you make your changes and move it to mainspace if it is ok Editorjummy (talk) 12:39, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- The article's pose is well written but the problem is that the article is not notable. The sources you cited are not reliable as this. In addendum, I looked for sources online and offline but found not substantial enough. Remember that adding WP: LOTSOFSOURCES doesn't make a run off mill notable. Maybe you write other things that you feel meets WP:N and WP:SIRS. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 13:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- thank you Editorjummy (talk) 14:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, not sure why you ask me - I see no connection with my editing and the subject you are asking for review. Please be careful about random request review. JarrahTree 08:11, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @JarrahTree sorry and thank you for the advise Editorjummy (talk) 08:12, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, not sure why you ask me - I see no connection with my editing and the subject you are asking for review. Please be careful about random request review. JarrahTree 08:11, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- thank you Editorjummy (talk) 14:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- The article's pose is well written but the problem is that the article is not notable. The sources you cited are not reliable as this. In addendum, I looked for sources online and offline but found not substantial enough. Remember that adding WP: LOTSOFSOURCES doesn't make a run off mill notable. Maybe you write other things that you feel meets WP:N and WP:SIRS. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 13:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @SafariScribe what is your idea about the article and sources can you make your changes and move it to mainspace if it is ok Editorjummy (talk) 12:39, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- ok @SafariScribe thank you so much Editorjummy (talk) 06:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC)