User talk:Editorq35

June 2023

Hello, I'm Alalch E.. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sam Harris have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. —Alalch E. 04:39, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This aspect holds significant importance as it addresses a notable cultural contrast between the East and the West. In the East, there exists a deeply rooted belief that truth, meditation, dhamma, or dharma are immensely valuable, and teachings of this nature are traditionally disseminated freely without any financial exchange. However, in the Western context, this practice is relatively uncommon. Therefore, emphasizing this distinction in the Wikipedia page serves as an insightful observation, shedding light on the differing cultural perspectives regarding the accessibility and distribution of such teachings. By acknowledging this contrast, we can better understand and appreciate the cultural nuances surrounding the value placed on the availability of transformative knowledge without financial barriers. Editorq35 (talk) 04:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing wrong with adding to the Sam Harris article, but your addition does not seem notable enough for inclusion. Also your source is Sam Harris's podcast, which is a primary source but for including something in an encyclopedia we like to have secondary and tertiary sources that demonstrate its significance. Finally, when you make edits it is helpful to leave edit summaries, particularly when reverting another edit for non-obvious reasons, so other editors have some indication of what you are doing. –CWenger (^ • @) 14:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Editorq35

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Editorq35 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Alalch E. 06:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"It does not make sense. :( " - secular monk Editorq35 Editorq35 (talk) 06:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Princess Persnickety (talk) 16:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good points. Thank you. (Psychiatry is often then not deployed used as weapon more often than we like to think.) Like: We need (police) to take Biden to calm down (in the psychiatry hospital.) Or Putin or any other person...) Plus it is very difficult to get honest feed pack to the psychiatrist because they have too much power. Like psychiatry can be very subjectively applied and most laws are terrified to defend them.. against some REAL socialtist-atheist ect. Megelish monsters. Talking from person experience. So in that light should psychiatry viewed. Thou the are on the right track. A LOT of room for growth. like commit to one person or be celibate that is a good moral ethical idea to have in life. Editorq35 (talk) 05:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]