User talk:ElectricTranquils

This is ElectricTranquils's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This doesn't appear to be an encyclopedic draft but a polemical essay. It has no references, and it isn't clear what its topic is.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:ElectricTranquils/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! ElectricTranquils, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for answering my question.

How do I go about experessing what I discovered in a way people can lookup other articles to compare knowledge?

Like the Josephus story about Babel when the languages were changed and comparing the gods and goddess in every religion proving their the same but known in different languages.

Also that the creator has a different name in every language.

Also that I can prove GOD ARCHANGEL LORD ZEUS, is the lord of the King James Bible and that the Hesiod and Homer stories stating that the Greek gods staying there were born islands, and caves, like lord zeus being born in dikasian cave, are cover up stories of the 4th generation king lord zeus who failed as a king. ElectricTranquils (talk) 15:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not the venue for your offering. It is not structured to be a place where original ideas are published. What you are describing must first (1) be written up in newspapers, magazines, and/or other independently published sources (we call these primary sources), and then, best (2) if those sources are then used for a more comprehensive published sources, such as review articles and book chapters. In short, the policy WP:Original Research does not allow first presentation of new, original insights and editors (whether in religion, science, history, or current events), and WP:VERIFY prevents us from presenting material that is not sourced. If your discoveries are noteworthy, they should appear in these other sources, after which, an article might be appropriate here. I hope this clarifies why your submission cannot appear here. Best holiday wishes. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 16:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]